Use of structured decision-making to explicitly incorporate environmental process understanding in management of coastal restoration projects: Case study on barrier islands of the northern Gulf of Mexico

被引:16
作者
Dalyander, P. Soupy [1 ]
Meyers, Michelle [2 ]
Mattsson, Brady [3 ]
Steyer, Gregory [4 ]
Godsey, Elizabeth [5 ]
McDonald, Justin [5 ]
Byrnes, Mark [6 ]
Ford, Mark [7 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, St Petersburg Coastal & Marine Sci Ctr, 600 4th St S, St Petersburg, FL 33701 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Natl Wetlands Res Ctr, 700 Cajundome Blvd, Lafayette, LA USA
[3] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Gregor Mendel Str 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[4] US Geol Survey, Livestock Show Off, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[5] US Army Corps Engineers, 109 St Joseph St, Mobile, AL USA
[6] Appl Coastal Res & Engn, 766 Falmouth Rd,Suite A-1, Mashpee, MA USA
[7] Natl Pk Serv, Southeast Reg Off, New Orleans, LA USA
关键词
Structured decision-making; Ecosystem restoration; Adaptive management; Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program; Gulf of Mexico; Barrier islands; EVOLUTION; CHAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.078
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coastal ecosystem management typically relies on subjective interpretation of scientific understanding, with limited methods for explicitly incorporating process knowledge into decisions that must meet multiple, potentially competing stakeholder objectives. Conversely, the scientific community lacks methods for identifying which advancements in system understanding would have the highest value to decision-makers. A case in point is barrier island restoration, where decision-makers lack tools to objectively use system understanding to determine how to optimally use limited contingency funds when project construction in this dynamic environment does not proceed as expected. In this study, collaborative structured decision-making (SDM) was evaluated as an approach to incorporate process understanding into mid-construction decisions and to identify priority gaps in knowledge from a management perspective. The focus was a barrier island restoration project at Ship Island, Mississippi, where sand will be used to close an extensive breach that currently divides the island. SDM was used to estimate damage that may occur during construction, and guide repair decisions within the confines of limited availability of sand and funding to minimize adverse impacts to project objectives. Sand was identified as more limiting than funds, and unrepaired major breaching would negatively impact objectives. Repairing minor damage immediately was determined to be generally more cost effective (depending on the longshore extent) than risking more damage to a weakened project. Key gaps in process-understanding relative to project management were identified as the relationship of island width to breach formation; the amounts of sand lost during breaching, lowering, or narrowing of the berm; the potential for minor breaches to self-heal versus developing into a major breach; and the relationship between upstream nourishment and resiliency of the berm to storms. This application is a prototype for using structured decision-making in support of engineering projects in dynamic environments where mid-construction decisions may arise; highlights uncertainty about barrier island physical processes that limit the ability to make robust decisions; and demonstrates the potential for direct incorporation of process-based models in a formal adaptive management decision framework. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 509
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Structured Decision-Making and Rapid Prototyping to Plan a Management Response to an Invasive Species
    Blomquist, Sean M.
    Johnson, Trisha D.
    Smith, David R.
    Call, Geoff P.
    Miller, Brant N.
    Thurman, W. Mark
    McFadden, Jamie E.
    Parkin, Mary J.
    Boomer, G. Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 1 (01): : 19 - 32
  • [2] Byrnes M.R., 2012, TR129 ERDCCHL
  • [3] Byrnes M.R., 1991, Society for Sedimentary Society, P43
  • [4] Byrnes MR, 2013, J COASTAL RES, P166, DOI [10.2112/SI63-014.1, 10.2112/S163-014.1]
  • [5] Improving management of a mid-Atlantic coastal barrier island through assessment of habitat condition
    Carruthers, Tim J. B.
    Beckert, Kris
    Schupp, Courtney A.
    Saxby, Tracey
    Kumer, John P.
    Thomas, Jane
    Sturgis, Brian
    Dennison, William C.
    Williams, Michael
    Fisher, Tom
    Zimmerman, Carl S.
    [J]. ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2013, 116 : 74 - 86
  • [6] Factors controlling the survival of coastal dunes during multiple hurricane impacts in 2004 and 2005: Santa Rosa barrier island, Florida
    Claudino-Sales, Vanda
    Wang, Ping
    Horwitz, Mark H.
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2008, 95 (3-4) : 295 - 315
  • [7] EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF GROUP OPINION - DELPHI METHOD
    DALKEY, N
    [J]. FUTURES, 1969, 1 (05) : 408 - 426
  • [8] Barrier Islands: Coupling Anthropogenic Stability with Ecological Sustainability
    Feagin, Rusty A.
    Smith, William K.
    Psuty, Norbert P.
    Young, Donald R.
    Luisa Martinez, M.
    Carter, Gregory A.
    Lucas, Kelly L.
    Gibeaut, James C.
    Gemma, Jane N.
    Koske, Richard E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 26 (06) : 987 - 992
  • [9] Bridging groundwater models and decision support with a Bayesian network
    Fienen, Michael N.
    Masterson, John P.
    Plant, Nathaniel G.
    Gutierrez, Benjamin T.
    Thieler, E. Robert
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (10) : 6459 - 6473
  • [10] Foxworth R.D., 1962, MISS GEOL SURV B, V93