Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Diabetes Family Impact Scale

被引:1
作者
Cetintas, Ismail [1 ]
Kostak, Melahat Akgun [1 ]
机构
[1] Trakya Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Nursing, Dept Pediat Nursing, Balkan Campus, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey
关键词
diabetes mellitus; family impact; scale; validity; reliability; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CONTENT VALIDITY; CHILDREN; SELF; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/jspn.12308
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Diabetes Family Impact Scale (DFIS). Methods and Design The study was carried out methodologically with 121 parents who have 6-18 year-old children with type 1 diabetes (n = 121). The collected data were analyzed by conducting confirmatory factor analysis,ttest, and Pearson's correlation analysis and by computing Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results The linguistic validity of the scale was ensured by undertaking translation and back-translation. Expert opinions were analyzed and all the content validity indices were found to be >= 0.80. The factor loadings of all the items ranged from 0.47 to 0.89, and the model fit indices were as follows:chi(2)/df = 1.21 and RMSEA = 0.04. Scores that were obtained across two temporally separated administrations were not significantly different (p > .05), and there was a strong correlation between the two sets of scores (ICC = 0.892;p < .001). The Cronbach's alpha of the scale was .881. The item-total correlation coefficients of the scale items ranged from .34 to .72. Conclusions Similar to the original assessment, the Turkish version of the DFIS consists of 14 items and 4 subscales. It is a valid and reliable measure that is suitable for use with Turkish samples. Researchers can use this scale to assess the effect of type 1 diabetes mellitus on the family of an affected child.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [11] Agreement between child self-report and parent proxy-report to evaluate quality of life in children with cancer
    Chang, PC
    Yeh, CH
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2005, 14 (02) : 125 - 134
  • [12] Cokluk o., 2012, MULTIVARIATE STAT SP, P271
  • [13] Definition, epidemiology and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents
    Craig, Maria E.
    Hattersley, Andrew
    Donaghue, Kim C.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2009, 10 : 3 - 12
  • [14] de Souza AC, 2017, EPIDEMIOL SERV SAUDE, V26, P649, DOI 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022
  • [15] DeVellis RF., 2012, SCALE DEV THEORY APP, P31
  • [16] A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability
    DeVon, Holli A.
    Block, Michelle E.
    Moyle-Wright, Patricia
    Ernst, Diane M.
    Hayden, Susan J.
    Lazzara, Deborah J.
    Savoy, Suzanne M.
    Kostas-Polston, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2007, 39 (02) : 155 - 164
  • [17] Drost E. A., 2011, Educ. Res. Perspect, V2011, P460, DOI [10.3316/informit.491551710186460, DOI 10.3316/INFORMIT.491551710186460]
  • [18] Emre MH, 2016, J TURGUT OZAL MED CT, V23, P36
  • [19] Esin N, 2015, RES PROCESS APPL CRI, P193
  • [20] Family functioning processes and diabetic ketoacidosis in youths with type I diabetes
    Geffken, Gary R.
    Lehmkuhl, Heather
    Walker, Kelly N.
    Storch, Eric A.
    Heidgerken, Amanda D.
    Lewin, Adam
    Williams, Laura B.
    Silverstein, Janet
    [J]. REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 53 (02) : 231 - 237