Intraoperative Effect of 2D vs 3D Fluoroscopy on Quality of Reduction and Patient-Related Outcome in Calcaneal Fracture Surgery

被引:14
|
作者
Halm, Jens A. [1 ]
Beerekamp, M. Suzan H. [1 ]
de Muinck-Keijzer, Robert Jan [1 ]
Beenen, Ludo F. M. [2 ]
Maas, Mario [2 ]
Goslings, J. Carel [3 ]
Schepers, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, AMC, Trauma Unit, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, AMC, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
trauma; calcaneus; fracture; 3D; 2D; fluoroscopy; imaging; outcome studies; AMERICAN ORTHOPEDIC FOOT; ANKLE SOCIETY SCORE; INTRAARTICULAR FRACTURES; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; CONSEQUENCES; FIXATION; PILON;
D O I
10.1177/1071100720926111
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy is thought to be advantageous in the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of calcaneal fractures. The goal of this multicenter randomized controlled trial was to investigate the clinical effect of additional intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy on postoperative quality of reduction and fixation and patient-reported outcome as compared to conventional 2-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy in patients with intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. Methods: Patients were randomized to 3D or conventional 2D fluoroscopy during operative treatment of calcaneal fractures. Primary outcome was the difference in quality of fracture reduction and implant position on postoperative computed tomography (CT). Secondary endpoints included intraoperative corrections (prior to wound closure), complications, and revision surgery (after wound closure). Function and patient-reported outcome were evaluated after surgery and included range of motion, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires, and Kellgren-Lawrence posttraumatic osteoarthritis classification. A total of 102 calcaneal fractures were included in the study in 100 patients. Fifty fractures were randomized to the 3D group and 52 to the 2D group. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in duration of surgery between the groups (2D 125 min vs 3D 147 min;P< .001). After 3D fluoroscopy, a total of 57 intraoperative corrections were performed in 28 patients (56%). The postoperative CT scan revealed an indication for additional revision of reduction or implant position in 69% of the 3D group vs 60% in the 2D fluoroscopy group. At 2 years, there was no difference in number of revision surgery, complications, FAOS, AOFAS score, SF-36 score, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Conclusion: The use of intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy in the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures prolongs the operative procedures without improving the quality of reduction and fixation. There was no benefit of intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy with regard to postoperative complications, quality of life, functional outcome, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis.
引用
收藏
页码:954 / 963
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Response to "Letter Regarding: Intraoperative Effect of 2D vs 3D Fluoroscopy on Quality of Reduction and Patient-Related Outcome in Calcaneal Fracture Surgery"
    Beerekamp, M. Suzan H.
    Halm, Jens A.
    Schepers, Tim
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 42 (02) : 246 - 247
  • [2] Comparison of intraoperative 2D vs. 3D imaging in open reduction and fixation of distal radius fractures
    Hammerle, Diego
    Osterhoff, Georg
    Allemann, Florin
    Werner, Clement Max Leonard
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2020, 46 (03) : 557 - 563
  • [3] The correlation between intra-operative 2D-and 3D fluoroscopy with postoperative CT-scans in the treatment of calcaneal fractures
    Beerekamp, M. S. H.
    Keizer, R. J. O. de Muinck
    Schepers, T.
    Beenen, L. F. M.
    Luitse, J. S. K.
    Schep, N. W.
    Ubbink, D. T.
    Goslings, J. C.
    Segers, M. J. M.
    Blokhuis, T. J.
    de Jong, V. M.
    Winkelhagen, J.
    Twigt, B.
    Maas, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 112 : 222 - 228
  • [4] Impact of 3D Printed Calcaneal Models on Fracture Understanding and Confidence in Orthopedic Surgery Residents
    Montgomery, Spencer Jason
    Kooner, Sahil Singh
    Ludwig, Taryn Elaine
    Schneider, Prism Steorra
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 77 (02) : 472 - 478
  • [5] Intraoperative 3D Imaging in Calcaneal Fracture Care-Clinical Implications and Decision Making
    Geerling, Jens
    Kendoff, Daniel
    Citak, Musa
    Zech, Stefan
    Gardner, Michael J.
    Huefner, Tobias
    Krettek, Christian
    Richter, Martinus
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 66 (03): : 768 - 773
  • [6] 2D vs. 3D Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures
    Knight, Jessica
    Alves-Pereira, Fatima
    Keen, Christopher E.
    Jaremko, Jacob L.
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (11):
  • [7] Real-Time 3D Reconstruction of Multiple Guidewires at Dose Values of Conventional 2D Fluoroscopy
    Voeth, Tim
    Koenig, Thomas
    Eulig, Elias
    Knaup, Michael
    Hoerndler, Klaus
    Kachelriess, Marc
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 12031
  • [8] Comparison of a ceiling-mounted 3D flat panel detector vs. conventional intraoperative 2D fluoroscopy in plate osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures with volar locking plate systems
    Seuthe, Raphael
    Seekamp, Andreas
    Kurz, Bodo
    Pfarr, Julian
    Schaefer, Jost Philipp
    Peh, Simon
    Lippross, Sebastian
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [9] Accuracy evaluation of fluoroscopy-based 2D and 3D pose reconstruction with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Van Duren, B. H.
    Pandit, H.
    Beard, D. J.
    Murray, D. W.
    Gill, H. S.
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2009, 31 (03) : 356 - 363
  • [10] Differences in Accuracy and Radiation Dose in Placement of Iliosacral Screws: Comparison between 3D and 2D Fluoroscopy
    Kulakowski, Michal
    Reichert, Pawel
    Elster, Karol
    Witkowski, Jaroslaw
    Sleczka, Pawel
    Morasiewicz, Piotr
    Oleksy, Lukasz
    Krolikowska, Aleksandra
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (06)