Students' interaction patterns in different online learning activities and their relationship with motivation, self-regulated learning strategy and learning performance

被引:49
作者
Cebi, Ayca [1 ]
Guyer, Tolga [2 ]
机构
[1] Trabzon Univ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, TR-61335 Trabzon, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Dept Comp Educ & Instruct Technol, TR-06500 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Interaction patterns; Motivation; SRL strategies; Learning performance; TOOL-USE; PARTICIPATION; ACHIEVEMENT; LEARNERS; BEHAVIOR; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-020-10151-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this study, students' interactions with different learning activities are examined and the relation among learning performance with different interaction patterns, learning performance, self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies and motivation is presented. Learning materials including different kinds of activities are prepared and presented to the use of 122 university students. As a result of the study that students spent longer time in the tutorial and video activities and they visit these activities more frequently. As a result of cluster analysis, students with the least interaction with learning activities take place in the first cluster, students who use video, example and forum activities to an intense take place in the second cluster, and students who spend more time in tutorial, exercise and concept map activities take place in the third cluster. The academic performances of students, who spend longer time in learning activities, are higher. Students in the third cluster have higher points in terms of intrinsic goal orientations, task value, control beliefs and self-efficacy for learning and performance. Finally, the results of this study show that SRL strategies differ from its sub-dimensions in terms of rehearsal, organization, elaboration, metacognitive self-regulation, time and study environment.
引用
收藏
页码:3975 / 3993
页数:19
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Proceedings Of Conference On Advanced Technology For Education
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications
[3]  
Boekaerts M., 1999, INT J EDUC RES, V31, P445, DOI [10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2, DOI 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2]
[4]   Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review [J].
Broadbent, J. ;
Poon, W. L. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 27 :1-13
[5]   Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance [J].
Broadbent, Jaclyn .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 33 :24-32
[6]  
BUTLER DL, 1995, REV EDUC RES, V65, P245, DOI 10.3102/00346543065003245
[7]  
Buyukozturk S., 2004, Educational Sciences: Theory Practice, V4, P207
[8]   Students' LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education [J].
Cerezo, Rebeca ;
Sanchez-Santillan, Miguel ;
Puerto Paule-Ruiz, M. ;
Carlos Nunez, J. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2016, 96 :42-54
[9]   The effect of self-regulated learning on college students' perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning [J].
Cho, Moon-Heum ;
Kim, Yanghee ;
Choi, DongHo .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 34 :10-17
[10]   Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories [J].
Cook, David A. ;
Artino, Anthony R. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 50 (10) :997-1014