Social impact assessment and ethical research principles: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part II

被引:31
作者
Baines, James T. [1 ]
Taylor, C. Nicholas [1 ]
Vanclay, Frank [2 ]
机构
[1] Taylor Baines & Associates, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Dept Cultural Geog, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
social research ethics; professional ethics; ethical dilemmas; reflexive practice; code of ethics; institutional context; COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT; CORPORATE;
D O I
10.1080/14615517.2013.850306
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper considers a range of ethical issues in social impact assessment (SIA) providing a commentary from a professional practice perspective. Drawing on its companion paper (Vanclay et al. 2013 Principles for ethical research involving humans: Ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal, 31(4): 243-253), the 18 principles of ethical research are discussed as they pertain to SIA practice. While the ethical principles are highly relevant and align well with good practice SIA, there will be situations where the specific requirements suggested by the principles need to be carefully thought through by practitioners. Although making some general conclusions, the paper's main purpose is to stimulate further debate about ethical issues within the impact assessment profession. Key recommendations that emerge for SIA practice include the need for SIA practitioners to use information sheets routinely, and to increase the use of signed consent forms. It is also recommended that the International Association for Impact Assessment provide a service to allow practitioners to gain ethical approval for their projects in non-routine cases.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 260
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Evaluating the use of Social Impact Assessment in the context of agricultural development projects in Iran [J].
Ahmadvand, Mostafa ;
Karami, Ezatollah ;
Zamani, Gholam Hossein ;
Vanclay, Frank .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2009, 29 (06) :399-407
[2]  
Baines J, 2009, AUSTRALAS J ENVIRON, V16, P6
[3]  
Baines J., 2003, INT HDB SOCIAL IMPAC, P26
[4]  
Baines JT, 2011, NEW DIRECTIONS IN SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ADVANCES, P96
[5]   The focus of impact assessment (and IAIA) must now shift to global climate change!! [J].
Burdge, Rabel J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2008, 28 (08) :618-622
[6]  
Craig D., 1990, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V10, P37
[7]   Public participation in commercial environments: critical reflections on community engagement methods used in the Australian plantation forestry industry [J].
Dare, Melanie ;
Vanclay, Frank ;
Schirmer, Jacki .
AUSTRALIAN FORESTRY, 2012, 75 (03) :180-191
[8]   Understanding community engagement in plantation forest management: insights from practitioner and community narratives [J].
Dare, Melanie ;
Vanclay, Frank ;
Schirmer, Jacki .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 54 (09) :1149-1168
[9]   Social impact assessment: the state of the art [J].
Esteves, Ana Maria ;
Franks, Daniel ;
Vanclay, Frank .
IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2012, 30 (01) :34-42
[10]   Social Development Needs Analysis as a tool for SIA to guide corporate-community investment: Applications in the minerals industry [J].
Esteves, Ana Maria ;
Vanclay, Frank .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2009, 29 (02) :137-145