Simulating Activities of Daily Living With Finite Element Analysis Improves Fracture Prediction for Patients With Metastatic Femoral Lesions

被引:39
作者
Goodheart, Jacklyn R. [1 ]
Cleary, Richard J. [2 ]
Damron, Timothy A. [1 ]
Mann, Kenneth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[2] Babson Coll, Div Math & Sci, Babson Pk, MA 02157 USA
关键词
fracture prediction; metastatic; femur; finite element; Mirels score; CT-SCAN DATA; TRABECULAR BONE; HIP FRACTURE; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PROXIMAL FEMUR; RISK-FACTORS; STRENGTH; JOINT; RADIOTHERAPY; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1002/jor.22887
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Predicting fracture risk for patients with metastatic femoral lesions remains an important clinical problem. Mirels' criterion remains the most formalized radiographic scoring system with good sensitivity (correctly identifying clinical fractures) but relatively poor specificity (correctly identify cases that d8o not fracture). A series of patients with metastatic femoral lesions had Computed Tomography (CT) scans, were followed prospectively for 4 months, and categorized into fracture (n = 5), non-fracture (n = 28), or stabilized (n = 11) groups. CT based-Finite Element (FE) modeling was used to predict fracture for these cases using axial compression (AC), level walking (LW), and aggressive stair ascent (ASA) loading conditions. The FE predicted fracture force was greater for the non-fracture compared to the fracture group for all loading cases. The ability of the FE models to predict fracture cases (sensitivity) was similar for the groups (Mirels, AC, LW: 80%, ASA: 100%). The ability of the models to correctly predict the non-fracture cases (specificity) was improved for AC (71%) and LW (86%) loading conditions, when compared to Mirels specificity (43%), but poorer for the ASA (21%) conditions. The results suggest that FE models that assess fracture risk using LW conditions can improve fracture prediction over Mirels scoring in a clinical population. (C) 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1226 / 1234
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Agresti A, 2012, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA
[2]   Finite element analysis and CT-based structural rigidity analysis to assess failure load in bones with simulated lytic defects [J].
Anez-Bustillos, Lorenzo ;
Derikx, Loes C. ;
Verdonschot, Nico ;
Calderon, Nathan ;
Zurakowski, David ;
Snyder, Brian D. ;
Nazarian, Ara ;
Tanck, Esther .
BONE, 2014, 58 :160-167
[3]   HIP-JOINT LOADING DURING WALKING AND RUNNING, MEASURED IN 2 PATIENTS [J].
BERGMANN, G ;
GRAICHEN, F ;
ROHLMANN, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1993, 26 (08) :969-990
[4]   Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities [J].
Bergmann, G ;
Deuretzbacher, G ;
Heller, M ;
Graichen, F ;
Rohlmann, A ;
Strauss, J ;
Duda, GN .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 34 (07) :859-871
[5]   Prediction of the strength and fracture location of the femoral neck by CT-based finite-element method: a preliminary study on patients with hip fracture [J].
Bessho, M ;
Ohnishi, I ;
Okazaki, H ;
Sato, W ;
Kominami, H ;
Matsunaga, S ;
Nakamura, K .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2004, 9 (06) :545-550
[6]  
Chang PB, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P57
[7]   Critical evaluation of Mirels' rating system for impending pathologic fractures [J].
Damron, TA ;
Morgan, H ;
Prakash, D ;
Grant, W ;
Aronowitz, J ;
Heiner, J .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (415) :S201-S207
[8]  
Damron TA, 2012, T ANN M ORTHOPEDIC R, V58, P1485
[9]   The assessment of the risk of fracture in femora with metastatic lesions Comparing case-specific finite element analyses with predictions by clinical experts [J].
Derikx, L. C. ;
van Aken, J. B. ;
Janssen, D. ;
Snyers, A. ;
Van der Linden, Y. M. ;
Verdonschot, N. ;
Tanck, E. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (08) :1135-1142
[10]   Inter- and intra-observer variation in classification systems for impending fractures of bone metastases [J].
El-Husseiny, Moataz ;
Coleman, Nigel .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (02) :155-160