Exergoeconomic assessment of a biomass-based hydrogen, electricity and freshwater production cycle combined with an electrolyzer, steam turbine and a thermal desalination process

被引:37
作者
Wang, Shuaibing [1 ]
Lin, Haitao [1 ]
Abed, Azher M. [2 ]
Sharma, Aman [3 ]
Fooladi, Hadi [4 ]
机构
[1] Yuxi Normal Univ, Yuxi 653100, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Al Mustaqbal Univ Coll, Air Conditioning & Refrigerat Tech Engn Dept, Babylon, Iraq
[3] GLA Univ Mathura, Dept Mech Engn, Chaumuhan, India
[4] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Energy Engn, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Biomass; gasification; Polygeneration cycle; Electrolyzer; Steam turbine; Thermal desalination process; Exergoeconomic; FUEL-CELL; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OXIDE ELECTROLYZER; INTEGRATED-SYSTEM; ENERGY; SOLAR; POWER; MULTIGENERATION; GASIFICATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.273
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Since biomass resources can be found with different contents in most regions of the world, biomass/gasification (Biog) coupling processes can be considered as an attractive and useful technology for integrating in polygeneration configurations. In this regard, a new polygeneration energy configuration based on Biog process is proposed and its conceptual analysis is presented. In the new energy process, a Rankine cycle, a water electrolysis cycle (based on solid oxide electrolyzer, SOE), and a multi-effect desalination (MED) unit are embedded to generate electricity, hydrogen fuel, and freshwater, respectively. The considered polygeneration configuration is comprehensively investigated and discussed utilizing a parametric evaluation and from thermodynamic, energetic and exergoeconomic points of view. Relying on the proposed system can provide a new approach to produce carbon-free hydrogen fuel and freshwater in order to achieve an efficient, modern and green polygeneration configuration. The results indicated that the electrical power generated by the considered polygeneration configuration is close to 1735 kW. In addition, the system is capable of producing almost 9880 kg/h of freshwater and 12.3 kg/h of hydrogen. In such a context, the energy efficiency and total products unit exergy cost were 36.4% and 16.6 USD/GJ, respectively. Also, the system could achieve an exergy efficiency of nearly 17.1%. Moreover, about 8.9 MW of process's exergy is destroyed. The performance of the proposed polygeneration configuration using four different biomass fuels is compared. It was determined that the total products unit exergy costs under paddy husk and paper biomass are approximately 14.8% and 8.6% higher than MSW, respectively.(c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33699 / 33718
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Solar thermal assisted proton exchange membrane electrolyzer and solid oxide fuel cell system based on biomass gasification for green power and hydrogen production: Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis [J].
Laleh, Shayan Sharafi ;
Mousavi, Haniyeh Sadat Rezaei ;
Rabet, Shayan ;
Nojavan, Farnaz ;
Yari, Mortaza ;
Soltani, Saeed .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 337
[32]   Multi-Criteria Optimization of a Biomass-Based Hydrogen Production System Integrated With Organic Rankine Cycle [J].
Zhang, Xiaoqi ;
Zhou, Yuling ;
Jia, Xiaotong ;
Feng, Yuheng ;
Dang, Qi .
FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2020, 8
[33]   Multi-Objective Optimization of a Geothermal Steam Turbine Combined With Reverse Osmosis and Multi-Effect Desalination for Sustainable Freshwater Production [J].
Farsi, Aida ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2022, 144 (05)
[34]   Life cycle assessment of biomass-based ethylene production in Sweden  —  is gasification or fermentation the environmentally preferable route? [J].
Christin Liptow ;
Anne-Marie Tillman ;
Matty Janssen .
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 :632-644
[35]   Life cycle assessment of biomass-based ethylene production in Sweden - is gasification or fermentation the environmentally preferable route? [J].
Liptow, Christin ;
Tillman, Anne-Marie ;
Janssen, Matty .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (05) :632-644
[36]   Process analysis of a biomass-based quad-generation plant for combined power, heat, cooling, and synthetic natural gas production [J].
Rudra, Souman ;
Rosendahl, Lasse ;
Blarke, Morten B. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 106 :1276-1285
[37]   Waste heat recovery of a combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle for gas turbine based multi-generation hydrogen and freshwater purposes: 4E comparison with a simple coupled Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle [J].
Zoghi, Mohammad ;
Hosseinzadeh, Nasser ;
Gharaie, Saleh ;
Zare, Ali .
THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2024, 53
[38]   Exergy Analysis of Alternative Configurations of Biomass-Based Light Olefin Production System with a Combined-Cycle Scheme via Methanol Intermediate [J].
Li, Yuping ;
Ye, Maolin ;
Tan, Fenghua ;
Wang, Chenguang ;
Long, Jinxing .
ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (02)
[39]   Environmental life cycle assessment of combined process for biodiesel and hydrogen production [J].
Faleh, Nahla ;
Ben Hnich, Khaoula ;
Khila, Zouhour ;
Hajjaji, Noureddine .
JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025, 27 (03) :1708-1722
[40]   4E assessment of integrated photovoltaic/thermal-based adsorption-electrolyzer for cooling and green hydrogen production [J].
Gado, Mohamed G. ;
Nada, Sameh ;
Hassan, Hamdy .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2023, 172 :604-620