Greenwashing Consumption: The Didactic Framing of ExxonMobil's Energy Solutions

被引:58
作者
Plec, Emily [1 ]
Pettenger, Mary [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Oregon Univ, Div Humanities, Dept Commun Studies, Monmouth, OR 97361 USA
[2] Western Oregon Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Monmouth, OR 97361 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE | 2012年 / 6卷 / 04期
关键词
ExxonMobil; Framing; Didactic Frame; Counterframes; Greenwashing; Biofuels; Environmental Rhetoric;
D O I
10.1080/17524032.2012.720270
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Corporate advertising campaigns increasingly use environmental frames to promote their products and processes, many of which are neither sustainable nor environmentally friendly. This study examines ExxonMobil's recent efforts at green advertising, focusing specifically on their widely aired Energy Solutions television advertisements. We argue that ExxonMobil's use of a didactic, greenwashed frame stifles criticism and discourages examination of ideologies of consumption by exploiting the ethos of the scientist and highlighting technological solutions to problems that are deeply tied to a culture of consumerism. The definition of green energy is controlled by those with the power to generate persuasive public messages about the sources and production of energy. Counterframes, however, can be employed to turn a questioning eye upon the solutions advanced by ExxonMobil. We issue a call for green frames that help citizens and consumers critically examine the ecological integrity of all means of energy production, and that call attention to the ways in which the greenwashing of research and development initiatives can dissuade necessary action, including reduction of US energy consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 476
页数:18
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, FORTUNE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ECOLOGIST, V33, P32
[3]  
[Anonymous], LEARNING MANAGE GLOB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1937, ATTITUDES HIST
[5]  
Avaaz.org, 2009, DONT LEAVE CLIMATE C
[6]  
Bateson G., 2000, STEPS ECOLOGY MIND
[7]  
Burke Kenneth., 1966, LANGUAGE SYMBOLIC AC
[8]  
Check T., 1993, SPEAKER GAVEL, V31, P27
[9]  
Check T., 1997, P 4 BIENN C COMM ENV, P133
[10]  
Check T., 2001, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6, P334