Counting visual and tactile events: The effect of attention on multisensory integration

被引:25
作者
Werkhoven, Peter J. [1 ]
van Erp, Jan B. R. [2 ]
Philippi, Tom G.
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] TNO Human Factors, Soesterberg, Netherlands
关键词
SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; AUDITORY SIGNALS; PERCEPTION; TOUCH; SEQUENCES; INFERENCE; ILLUSION;
D O I
10.3758/APP.71.8.1854
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Irrelevant events in one sensory modality can influence the number of events that are perceived in another modality. Previously, the underlying process of sensory integration was studied in conditions in which participants knew a priori which sensory modality was relevant and which was not. Consequently, (bottom-up) sensory interference and (top-down) selective attention were confounded. We disentangled these effects by measuring the influence of visual flashes on the number of tactile taps that were perceived, and vice versa, in two conditions. In the cue condition, participants were instructed on which modality to report before the bimodal stimulus was presented. In the no-cue condition, they were instructed after stimulus presentation. Participants reported the number of events that they perceived for bimodal combinations of one, two, or three flashes and one, two, or three taps. Our main findings were that (1) in no-cue conditions, the influence of vision on touch was stronger than was the influence of touch on vision; (2) in cue conditions, the integration effects were smaller than those in no-cue conditions; and (3) irrelevant taps were less easily ignored than were irrelevant flashes. This study disentangled previously confounded bottom-up and top-down effects: The bottom-up influence of vision on touch was stronger, but vision was also more easily suppressed by top-down selective attention. We have compared our results qualitatively and quantitatively with recently proposed sensory-integration models.
引用
收藏
页码:1854 / 1861
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contextual integration of visual objects necessitates attention
    Gronau, Nurit
    Shachar, Meytal
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2014, 76 (03) : 695 - 714
  • [32] Behavioral Impact of Unisensory and Multisensory Audio-Tactile Events: Pros and Cons for Interlimb Coordination in Juggling
    Zelic, Gregory
    Mottet, Denis
    Lagarde, Julien
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (02):
  • [33] Exploring the time window for causal inference and the multisensory integration of actions and their visual effects
    Debats, Nienke B.
    Heuer, Herbert
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2020, 7 (08):
  • [34] Cross-correlation between Auditory and Visual Signals Promotes Multisensory Integration
    Parise, Cesare V.
    Harrar, Vanessa
    Ernst, Marc O.
    Spence, Charles
    MULTISENSORY RESEARCH, 2013, 26 (03) : 307 - 316
  • [35] Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration
    Smit, Sophie
    Rich, Anina N.
    Zopf, Regine
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (12):
  • [36] Modality-specific attention and multisensory integration of emotions in schizophrenia: Reduced regulatory effects
    de Jong, J. J.
    Hodiamont, P. P. G.
    de Gelder, B.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2010, 122 (1-3) : 136 - 143
  • [37] Investigating the Kappa Effect Elicited Through Concurrent Visual and Tactile Stimulation
    De Pra, Yuri
    Catrambone, Vincenzo
    van Wassenhove, Virginie
    Moscatelli, Alessandro
    Valenza, Gaetano
    Bianchi, Matteo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS, 2024, 17 (04) : 924 - 934
  • [38] Tactile, Visual, and Crossmodal Visual-Tactile Change Blindness: The Effect of Transient Type and Task Demands
    Riggs, Sara Lu
    Sarter, Nadine
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2019, 61 (01) : 5 - 24
  • [39] Effect of stimulus intensity on response time distribution in multisensory integration
    Ágoston Török
    Orsolya Kolozsvári
    Tamás Virágh
    Ferenc Honbolygó
    Valéria Csépe
    Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 2014, 8 : 209 - 216
  • [40] The effect of manipulability and religion on the multisensory integration of objects in peripersonal space
    van Elk, Michiel
    COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 5 (01) : 36 - 44