Endowments vs. market potential: What explains the relocation of industry after the Polish reunification in 1918?

被引:41
作者
Wolf, Nikolaus [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Econ, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
economic geography; economic integration; interwar period; Poland;
D O I
10.1016/j.eeh.2005.08.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
How did the location of industry across interwar Poland react to the Polish reunification? After more than 120 years of political and economic separation, Poland was reunified at the end of 1918. In consequence, the removal of internal tariff barriers and improved infrastructure strengthened the domestic market, while foreign market relations were cut off. Similarly, the geographical distribution of factor endowments was changed, for example, through internal migration. How did these forces interact to determine the location of industry? We survey the dynamics of industrial location between 1902 and 1925-1937 and estimate a specification that nests market potential and comparative advantage to quantify their respective impact during the interwar years. The results point to a role for both, comparative advantage and access to markets. We show that both statistically and economically the most important factors were the endowment with skilled labour and inter-industry-linkages. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 42
页数:21
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S ;
Robinson, JA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (05) :1369-1401
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, HDB INT TRADE
[3]  
[Anonymous], EC POLICY
[4]   Economic geography, industry location and trade: The evidence [J].
Brulhart, M .
WORLD ECONOMY, 1998, 21 (06) :775-801
[5]   Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: an empirical test [J].
Davis, DR ;
Weinstein, DE .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 59 (01) :1-23
[6]   Economic geography and regional production structure: An empirical investigation [J].
Davis, DR ;
Weinstein, DE .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 43 (02) :379-407
[7]   Bones, bombs, and break points: The geography of economic activity [J].
Davis, DR ;
Weinstein, DE .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (05) :1269-1289
[8]   Technology, geography, and trade [J].
Eaton, J ;
Kortum, S .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (05) :1741-1779
[9]   The geographic concentration of industry: Does natural advantage explain agglomeration? [J].
Ellison, G ;
Glaeser, EL .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (02) :311-316
[10]  
FREMDLING R, 1979, INDUSTRIALISERIUNG R, V19, P56