Climate Response Uncertainty and the Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions

被引:35
|
作者
Newbold, Stephen C. [1 ]
Daigneault, Adam [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Ctr Environm Econ, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[2] US EPA, Climate Change Div, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[3] Climate Change Div, US EPA, Washington, DC USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS | 2009年 / 44卷 / 03期
关键词
Climate change; Climate sensitivity; Uncertainty; Catastrophe; SENSITIVITY; ENSEMBLE; FUTURE; SYSTEM; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-009-9290-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Some recent research suggests that uncertainty about the response of the climate system to atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations can have a disproportionately large influence on benefits estimates for climate change policies, potentially even dominating the effect of the discount rate. In this paper we conduct a series of numerical simulation experiments to investigate the quantitative significance of climate response uncertainty for economic assessments of climate change. First we characterize climate uncertainty by constructing two probability density functions-a Bayesian model-averaged and a Bayesian updated version-based on a combination of uncertainty ranges for climate sensitivity reported in the scientific literature. Next we estimate the willingness to pay of a representative agent for a range of emissions reduction policies using two simplified economic models. Our results illustrate the potential for large risk premiums in benefits estimates as suggested by the recent theoretical work on climate response uncertainty, and they show that the size and even the sign of the risk premium may depend crucially on how the posterior distribution describing the overall climate sensitivity uncertainty is constructed and on the specific shape of the damage function.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 377
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impacts of nationally determined contributions on 2030 global greenhouse gas emissions: uncertainty analysis and distribution of emissions
    Benveniste, Helene
    Boucher, Olivier
    Guivarch, Celine
    Le Treut, Herve
    Criqui, Patrick
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (01):
  • [32] Greenhouse gas emissions and the stability of equity markets
    Aharon, David Y.
    Baig, Ahmed S.
    Jacoby, Gady
    Wu, Zhenyu
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2024, 92
  • [33] Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions
    Jonas, Matthias
    Bun, Rostyslav
    Nahorski, Zbigniew
    Marland, Gregg
    Gusti, Mykola
    Danylo, Olha
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2019, 24 (06) : 839 - 852
  • [34] Meeting the climate change challenge: a scan of greenhouse gas emissions in BC communities
    Burch, Sarah
    Herbert, Yuill
    Robinson, John
    LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 20 (11) : 1290 - 1308
  • [35] Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories
    Dodman, David
    ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 2009, 21 (01) : 185 - 201
  • [36] Climate Change, Moral Integrity, and Obligations to Reduce Individual Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Hedberg, Trevor
    ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 21 (01) : 64 - 80
  • [37] Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions
    Matthias Jonas
    Rostyslav Bun
    Zbigniew Nahorski
    Gregg Marland
    Mykola Gusti
    Olha Danylo
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2019, 24 : 839 - 852
  • [38] An Assessment of the Link Between Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories and Climate Action Plans
    Boswell, Michael R.
    Greve, Adrienne I.
    Seale, Tammy L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2010, 76 (04) : 451 - 462
  • [39] Business responses to climate change: strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Vietnam
    Binh Hoang Duc
    Khang Do Ba
    ASIA PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW, 2017, 23 (04) : 596 - 620
  • [40] Assessment of urgent impacts of greenhouse gas emissions—the climate tipping potential (CTP)
    Susanne V. Jørgensen
    Michael Z. Hauschild
    Per H. Nielsen
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 919 - 930