Metabolic Biomarker-Based BRAFV600 Mutation Association and Prediction in Melanoma

被引:20
|
作者
Saadani, Hanna [1 ]
van der Hiel, Bernies [1 ]
Aalbersberg, Else A. [1 ]
Zavrakidis, Ioannis [2 ]
Haanen, John B. A. G. [3 ]
Hoekstra, Otto S. [4 ]
Boellaard, Ronald [4 ]
Stokkel, Marcel P. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Nucl Med, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
F-18-FDG PET/CT; melanoma; BRAF; radiomics; TUMOR TEXTURE ANALYSIS; F-18-FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE ACCUMULATION; PET; FEATURES; CANCER; RECONSTRUCTION; REGULARIZATION; REPEATABILITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.119.228312
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to associate and predict B-rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma valine 600 (BRAFV600) mutation status with both conventional and radiomics F-18-FDG PET/CT features, while exploring several methods of feature selection in melanoma radiomics. Methods: Seventy unresectable stage III-IV melanoma patients who underwent a baseline F-18-FDG PET/CT scan were identified. Patients were assigned to the BRAFV600 group or BRAF wild-type group according to mutational status. F-18-FDG uptake quantification was performed by semiautomatic lesion delineation. Four hundred eighty radiomics features and 4 conventional PET features (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, and total lesion glycolysis) were extracted per lesion. Six different methods of feature selection were implemented, and 10-fold cross-validated predictive models were built for each. Model performances were evaluated with areas under the curve (AUCs) for the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Thirty-five BRAFV600 mutated patients (100 lesions) and 35 BRAF wild-type patients (79 lesions) were analyzed. AUCs predicting the BRAFV600 mutation varied from 0.54 to 0.62 and were susceptible to feature selection method. The best AUCs were achieved by feature selection based on literature, a penalized binary logistic regression model, and random forest model. No significant difference was found between the BRAFV600 and BRAF wild-type group in conventional PET features or predictive value. Conclusion: BRAFV600 mutation status is not associated with, nor can it be predicted with, conventional PET features, whereas radiomics features were of low predictive value (AUC = 0.62). We showed feature selection methods to influence predictive model performance, describing and evaluating 6 unique methods. Detecting BRAFV600 status in melanoma based on F-18-FDG PET/CT alone does not yet provide clinically relevant knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:1545 / 1552
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cellular and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenic side effects and resistance to BRAF inhibitors in metastatic melanoma with BRAFV600 mutation: State of the knowledge
    Capovilla, Mathieu
    ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE, 2013, 33 (06) : 375 - 385
  • [22] Efficacy of rechallenge with BRAF inhibition therapy in patients with advanced BRAFV600 mutant melanoma
    Vinal, D.
    Martinez, D.
    Espinosa, E.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 21 (08) : 1061 - 1066
  • [23] Efficacy of rechallenge with BRAF inhibition therapy in patients with advanced BRAFV600 mutant melanoma
    D. Viñal
    D. Martinez
    E. Espinosa
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2019, 21 : 1061 - 1066
  • [24] Sequencing Treatment in BRAFV600 Mutant Melanoma: Anti-PD-1 Before and After BRAF Inhibition
    Johnson, Douglas B.
    Pectasides, Eirini
    Feld, Emily
    Ye, Fei
    Zhao, Shilin
    Johnpulle, Romany
    Merritt, Ryan
    McDermott, David F.
    Puzanov, Igor
    Lawrence, Donald
    Sosman, Jeffrey A.
    Buchbinder, Elizabeth
    Sullivan, Ryan J.
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2017, 40 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [25] Effect of Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Dose of Vemurafenib in Patients With BRAFV600 Mutation-Positive Metastatic Malignancy
    Zhang, Weijiang
    McIntyre, Christine
    Forbes, Harper
    Gaafar, Rabab
    Kohail, Hanaa
    Beck, J. Thaddeus
    Plestina, Stjepko
    Bertran, Enric
    Riehl, Todd
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 8 (06): : 837 - 843
  • [26] Prognostic Value of BRAFV600 Mutations in Melanoma Patients After Resection of Metastatic Lymph Nodes
    Stéphanie Moreau
    Philippe Saiag
    Philippe Aegerter
    Daphné Bosset
    Christine Longvert
    Zofia Hélias-Rodzewicz
    Cristi Marin
    Frédérique Peschaud
    Sophie Chagnon
    Utte Zimmermann
    Thierry Clerici
    Jean-François Emile
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012, 19 : 4314 - 4321
  • [27] Health-related quality of life in patients with fully resected BRAFV600 mutation-positive melanoma receiving adjuvant vemurafenib
    Schadendorf, Dirk
    Di Giacomo, Anna Maria
    Demidov, Lev
    Merelli, Barbara
    Bondarenko, Igor
    Ascierto, Paolo A.
    Herbert, Christopher
    Mackiewicz, Andrzej
    Rutkowski, Piotr
    Guminski, Alexander
    Goodman, Grant R.
    Simmons, Brian
    Ye, Chenglin
    Hong, Agnes
    Lewis, Karl
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 123 : 155 - 161
  • [28] Controversies in Intrapatient Melanoma BRAFV600E Mutation Status
    Riveiro-Falkenbach, Erica
    Santos-Briz, Angel
    Rios-Martin, Juan J.
    Rodriguez-Peralto, Jose L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 39 (04) : 291 - 295
  • [29] First-line atezolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma
    de Azevedo, Sergio Jobim
    de Melo, Andreia Cristina
    Roberts, Louise
    Caro, Ivor
    Xue, Cloris
    Wainstein, Alberto
    PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2021, 34 (05) : 973 - 977
  • [30] Innate immune cell infiltration in melanoma metastases affects survival and is associated with BRAFV600E mutation status
    Dabrosin, Nina
    Juul, Karen Sloth
    Georgsen, Jeanette Baehr
    Andrup, Simon
    Schmidt, Henrik
    Steiniche, Torben
    Ollegaard, Trine Heide
    Behrndtz, Louise Bonnelykke
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2019, 29 (01) : 30 - 37