Cemented vs. cementless fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:57
作者
Prasad, Anoop K. [1 ]
Tan, Jaimee H. S. [2 ]
Hanna, Sammy A. [1 ]
Dawson-Bowling, Sebastian [1 ]
Bedair, Hany S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed Surg, Royal London Hosp, London, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, London, England
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Newton Wellesley Hosp, Kaplan Joint Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Newton, MA USA
关键词
cemented; cementless; total knee replacement; LOADED BONE-CEMENT; TIBIAL COMPONENTS; PROPHYLACTIC USE; FOLLOW-UP; HIP; OUTCOMES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1302/2058-5241.5.200030
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Over 100,000 total knee replacements (TKRs) are carried out in the UK annually, with cemented fixation accounting for approximately 95% of all primary TKRs. In Australia, 68.1% of all primary TKRs use cemented fixation, and only 10.9% use cementless fixation. However, there has been a renewed interest in cementless fixation as a result of improvements in implant design and manufacturing technology. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of cemented and cementless fixation in primary TKR. Outcome measures included the revision rate and patient reported functional scores. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from the earliest available date to November 2018 for randomized controlled trials of primary TKAs comparing cemented versus cementless fixation outcomes. Six studies met our inclusion criteria and were analysed. A total of 755 knees were included; 356 knees underwent cemented fixation, 399 underwent cementless fixation. They were followed up for an average of 8.4 years (range: 2.0 to 16.6). This study found no significant difference in revision rates and knee function in cemented versus cementless TKR at up to 16.6-year follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 798
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
A ustralian Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration, 2010, LCS DUOF FEM KNEE RE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 16 ANN REP 2019
[3]  
(AOANJRR) AOANJRR, 2018, HIP KNEE SHOULDER AR
[4]   Cementless total knee arthroplasty [J].
Aprato, Alessandro ;
Risitano, Salvatore ;
Sabatini, Luigi ;
Giachino, Matteo ;
Agati, Gabriele ;
Massse, Alessandro .
ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (07)
[5]   Hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants compared with cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty -: A Randomized trial of outcomes at five years [J].
Beaupre, L. A. ;
al-Yamani, M. ;
Huckell, J. R. ;
Johnston, D. W. C. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (10) :2204-2211
[6]  
BELLAMY N, 1995, J RHEUMATOL, V22, P49
[7]  
Berger RA, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P58
[8]   Prophylactic use of antibiotic bone cement - An emerging standard - In the affirmative [J].
Bourne, RB .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (04) :69-72
[9]   Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation -: A randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years [J].
Carlsson, Å ;
Björkman, A ;
Besjakov, J ;
Önsten, I .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2005, 76 (03) :362-369
[10]   Cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty in young patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Chen, Chengyu ;
Li, Ruodong .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (01)