Anteromedial Portal Versus Outside-In Technique for Creating Femoral Tunnels in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

被引:16
作者
Chang, Moon Jong [1 ]
Chang, Chong Bum [1 ,2 ]
Won, Ho Hyun [1 ]
Je, Min Soo [1 ]
Kim, Tae Kyun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Joint Reconstruct Ctr, Songnam, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
LENGTH; PLACEMENT; POSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2013.06.011
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether the anteromedial (AM) portal and outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction differ (1) in the coronal femoral tunnel position, (2) in the femoral tunnel length, and (3) in the incidence of femoral tunnel-related complications, such as femoral socket blowout. Methods: We examined 63 knees undergone primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using the AM portal technique (AM portal group) and 54 knees using the outside-in technique (outside-in group). Coronal femoral tunnel positions between the 2 groups were assessed on postoperative tunnel-view radiographs and compared. Comparisons of femoral tunnel lengths, proportions of knees with a femoral tunnel length of less than 30 mm, and incidences of femoral tunnel-related complications were performed between the 2 groups. Results: There were no significant differences in coronal femoral tunnel positions between the AM portal and outside-in groups (56.6 degrees v 56.4 degrees, P > .99). Differences in femoral tunnel lengths between the AM portal and outside-in groups did not reach statistical significance (37.6 mm and 39.0 mm, respectively; P = .097), but the tunnel length of the outside-in group showed smaller variation than that of the AM portal group in terms of standard deviation (2.7 v 6.0). In addition, the AM portal group had a significantly greater proportion of knees with a femoral tunnel length of less than 30 mm than the outside-in group (14% v 0%, P = .004). There were 2 tunnel-related complications (3%) (highly suspicious cortical blowouts) in the AM portal group and none in the outside-in group (P = .499). Conclusions: This study shows that compared with the AM portal technique, the outside-in technique can achieve a similar femoral tunnel position in the coronal plane with a reduced chance of a femoral tunnel length of less than 30 mm. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
引用
收藏
页码:1533 / 1539
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Transtibial Versus Anteromedial Portal Reaming in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Anatomic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Surgical Technique
    Bedi, Asheesh
    Musahl, Volker
    Steuber, Volker
    Kendoff, Daniel
    Choi, Dan
    Allen, Answorth A.
    Pearle, Andrew D.
    Altchek, David W.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (03) : 380 - 390
  • [2] Comparisons of Femoral Tunnel Position and Length in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Modified Transtibial Versus Anteromedial Portal Techniques
    Chang, Chong Bum
    Choi, Ja-Young
    Koh, In Jun
    Lee, Kil Jae
    Lee, Kyung-Hag
    Kim, Tae Kyun
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (10) : 1389 - 1394
  • [3] Oblique Femoral Tunnel Placement Can Increase Risks of Short Femoral Tunnel and Cross-Pin Protrusion in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Chang, Chong Bum
    Yoo, Jae Ho
    Chung, Byung June
    Seong, Sang Cheol
    Kim, Tae Kyun
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (06) : 1237 - 1245
  • [4] The Relationship Between Femoral Tunnels Created by the Transtibial, Anteromedial Portal, and Outside-In Techniques and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Footprint
    Gadikota, Hemanth R.
    Sim, Jae Ang
    Hosseini, Ali
    Gill, Thomas J.
    Li, Guoan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (04) : 882 - 888
  • [5] Femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Rationale of the two incision technique
    Garofalo R.
    Moretti B.
    Kombot C.
    Moretti L.
    Mouhsine E.
    [J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2 (1)
  • [6] Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the two-incision technique
    Garofalo, Raffaele
    Mouhsine, Elyazid
    Chambat, Pierre
    Siegrist, Olivier
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2006, 14 (06) : 510 - 516
  • [7] The effect of femoral tunnel starting position on tunnel length in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cadaveric study
    Golish, S. Raymond
    Baumfeld, Joshua A.
    Schoderbek, Robert J.
    Miller, Mark D.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (11) : 1187 - 1192
  • [8] Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging study
    Hantes, Michael Elias
    Zachos, Vasilios C.
    Liantsis, Athanasios
    Venouziou, Aaron
    Karantanas, Apostolos H.
    Malizos, Konstantinos N.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2009, 17 (08) : 880 - 886
  • [9] Harner CD, 2008, ARTHROSCOPY, V24, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.019
  • [10] Anatomical limitations of transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Heming, James F.
    Rand, Jason
    Steiner, Mark E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (10) : 1708 - 1715