Bayes and Base Rates: What Is an Informative Prior for Actuarial Violence Risk Assessment?

被引:11
|
作者
Harris, Grant T. [1 ]
Rice, Marnie E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Waypoint Ctr Mental Hlth Care, Penetanguishene, ON, Canada
关键词
APPRAISAL-GUIDE; CHILD MOLESTERS; RECIDIVISM; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOPATHS; STATISTICS; FALLACY;
D O I
10.1002/bsl.2048
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Bayes' theorem describes an axiomatic relationship among marginal and conditional proportions within a single experiment. In many ways, it has been fruitful to greatly extend this idea to the task of drawing inferences from data much more generally. Commonly, what matters is how all prior knowledge is revised (or not) by new findings resulting in posterior (sometimes subjective) probabilities. And, to address many important problems, it is sensible to conceive of probability in such subjective terms. However, some commentators in the domain of violence risk assessment have assumed an analogous axiomatic relationship among marginals (i.e., priors in the form of base rates) observed in one study and conditionals (i.e., posteriors in the form of revised rates) expected in a separate study or assessment context. We present examples from our own research to suggest this assumption is generally unwarranted and ultimately an unaddressed empirical matter. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 124
页数:22
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] PRESCRIPTIVE APPROACHES TO COMMUNICATING THE RISK OF VIOLENCE IN ACTUARIAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Scurich, Nicholas
    John, Richard S.
    PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2012, 18 (01) : 50 - 78
  • [2] Actuarial assessment of violence risk -: To weigh or not to weigh?
    Grann, Martin
    Langstrom, Niklas
    CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2007, 34 (01) : 22 - 36
  • [3] Two-Tiered Violence Risk Estimates: A Validation Study of an Integrated-Actuarial Risk Assessment Instrument
    Mills, Jeremy F.
    Gray, Andrew L.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2013, 10 (04) : 361 - 371
  • [4] Prioritizing Police Investigations of Intimate Partner Violence Using Actuarial Risk Assessment
    Henning, Kris
    Campbell, Christopher M.
    Stewart, Gregory
    Johnson, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF POLICE AND CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 36 (04) : 667 - 678
  • [5] Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients
    Harris, GT
    Rice, ME
    Camilleri, JA
    JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2004, 19 (09) : 1063 - 1074
  • [6] Rates of violence in patients classified as high risk by structured risk assessment instruments
    Singh, Jay P.
    Fazel, Seena
    Gueorguieva, Ralitza
    Buchanan, Alec
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 204 (03) : 180 - 187
  • [7] Protective Factor Assessments: What Are We Measuring?-An Investigation of the Internal Validity of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk
    Abbiati, Milena
    Golay, Philippe
    Gasser, Jacques
    Moulin, Valerie
    CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 47 (04) : 383 - 398
  • [8] The key role of base rates: systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive value of four risk assessment instruments
    Weber, Michael A.
    Schnyder, Nina
    Kirschstein, Madeleine A.
    Graf, Marc
    Endrass, Jerome
    Rossegger, Astrid
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2025, 155