A Genuine Monotheism for Christians, Muslims, Jews, and All

被引:0
作者
Edwards, Rem B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES | 2017年 / 52卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1353/ecu.2017.0053
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
Today's conflicts between religions are grounded largely in historical injustices and grievances but partly in serious conceptual disagreements. This essay agrees with Miroslav Volf that a nontritheistic Christian account of the Trinity is highly desirable. Three traditional models of the Trinity are examined. In their pure, unmixed form, two of them should logically be acceptable to Jews, Muslims, and strict monotheists who regard Christianity as inherently tritheistic, despite lip service to one God. In the social model, three distinct self aware subjects are unified by being in perfect harmony with each other. Despite Volf's best defense of this, to conceive of three gods, this is how one would go about it. In the psychological model, one divine subject has three psychological capacities memory, understanding, and will. In the functional model, one subject relates to the world in three different ways as creator, redeemer, and companion. These two are genuinely monotheistic. Finally, a monotheistic account of the unity of Jesus with God is proposed for consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 586
页数:33
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Al-Ghazali, 1992, 99 BEAUTIFUL NAMES G
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MABDA ENGL MON SER, V20
[3]  
Blanshard Brand, 1975, REASON AND BELIEF, P391
[4]  
Bracken Joseph A, 1997, TRINITY IN PROCESS, P2
[5]  
Channing William Ellery, 1903, WORKS W ELLERY CHANN, V3, P70
[6]  
Clayton P, 2004, IN WHOM WE LIVE AND MOVE AND HAVE OUR BEING, P249
[7]  
Clayton Philip, 2008, ADVENTURES SPIRIT GO, P149
[8]  
Craig William Lane, 2003, HIS PHILOS FDN CHRIS
[9]  
Edwards Rem B, 2014, PROCESS STUD, V43, P87
[10]  
Edwards Rem B, 2000, PROCESS STUD, V20, P77