Freedom and Justice in Trade Governance

被引:0
作者
Goff, Sarah C. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Govt, London, England
关键词
consent; exploitation; freedom; cooperation; global justice; liberalism; fair trade;
D O I
10.1017/S0892679420000386
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Two recent books consider the future of trade governance.Consent and Tradeproposes reforms to trade agreements so that states can consent more freely to their terms.On Trade Justicedefends reforms to the World Trade Organization, arguing that multilateralism is the foundation for a "new global deal" on trade. Each book describes trade's distinctive features and proposes a principle to regulate both trade and trade governance.Consent and Tradedefends a principle of respect for state consent in trade agreements.On Trade Justiceoffers a theory of trade justice that requires nonexploitation. Consent and nonexploitation are important principles for economic exchanges. However, trade governance and trade itself are different forms of cooperation, with different agents and different interests at stake. Consent and nonexploitation are less compelling as principles for trade governance than for trade itself. Both books understate the conflict between their principles for trade governance and liberal justice.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 412
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Barry Christian., 2008, International Trade and Labor Standards: A Proposal for Linkage
  • [2] Beitz C.R., 1979, POLITICAL THEORY INT
  • [3] Brock Gillian., 2009, GLOBAL JUSTICE COSMO
  • [4] Brown AndrewG., 2012, The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization, P677
  • [5] Caney S, 2005, Justice Beyond Borders
  • [6] Christensen J., 2015, Social Theory and Practice, V41, P505
  • [7] Christensen James., 2018, Trade Justice
  • [8] Garcia F, 2018, CONSENT TRADE TRADIN
  • [9] Garcia FrankJ., 2003, Trade, Inequality, and Justice: Toward a Liberal Theory of Just Trade
  • [10] Garcia FrankJ., 2013, GLOBAL JUSTICE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW: THREE TAKES