Conducting a multicentre and multinational qualitative study on patient transitions

被引:35
作者
Johnson, Julie K. [1 ]
Barach, Paul [2 ,3 ]
Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Ctr Clin Governance Res, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Patient Safety Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Sci Inst Qual Healthcare IQ Healthcare, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Kalorama Fdn, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Primary Care, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
基金
欧盟第七框架计划;
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; COMMUNITIES; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001197
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A multicentre, multinational research study requires careful planning and coordination to accomplish the aims of the study and to ensure systematic and rigorous examination of all project methods and data collected. Objective: The aim of this paper is to describe the approach we used during the HANDOVER Project to develop a multicentre, multinational research project for studying transitions of patient care while creating a community of practice for the researchers. Method: We highlight the process used to assure the quality of a multicentre qualitative study and to create a codebook for data analysis as examples of attending to the community of practice while conducting rigorous qualitative research. Findings: Essential elements for the success of this multinational, multilanguage research project included recruiting a strong research team, explicit planning for decision-making processes to be used throughout the project, acknowledging the differences among the study settings and planning the protocols to capitalise upon those differences. Conclusions: Although not commonly discussed in reports of large research projects, there is an underlying, concurrent stream of activities to develop a cohesive team that trusts and respects one another's skills and that engage independent researchers in a group process that contributes to achieving study goals. We discuss other lessons learned and offer recommendations for other teams planning multicentre research.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 28
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Aisen ML, 1997, J NEUROL REHABIL, V11, P185
  • [2] [Anonymous], IDENTIFY BASIC ELEME
  • [3] A primer on the design, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials
    Appel, Lawrence J.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 1 (06): : 1360 - 1367
  • [4] Brassard M., 1994, MEMORY JOGGER
  • [5] Corbin J, 1990, QUAL SOCIOL, V10, P3
  • [6] The challenges of cross-national research in primary health care across Europe
    Dean, SC
    Harper, CE
    Cappuccio, FP
    Rink, E
    Dirckx, C
    Arnout, J
    Zito, F
    Iacoviello, L
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2005, 22 (03) : 341 - 346
  • [7] Division of Cancer Prevention, 2012, CLIN TRIALS MAN
  • [8] Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings
    Finfgeld-Connett, Deborah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2010, 66 (02) : 246 - 254
  • [9] Grol R, 2005, IMPROVING PATIENT CA, P273
  • [10] Challenges to Conducting Multicenter Clinical Research Ten Points to Consider
    Irving, Sharon Y.
    Curley, Martha A. Q.
    [J]. AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 19 (02) : 164 - 169