The investigation of the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis

被引:40
作者
Mishiro, Yasuo [1 ]
Sakagami, Masafumi [1 ]
Kitahara, Tadashi [2 ]
Kondoh, Kazumasa [2 ]
Okumura, Shin-ichi [3 ]
机构
[1] Hyogo Med Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 6638501, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Suita, Osaka 565, Japan
[3] Osaka Rosai Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Osaka, Japan
关键词
cholesteatoma; Kaplan-Meier survival analysis; recurrence rate; surgical methods;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e318181337f
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Study Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Three hundred forty-five patients with middle car cholesteatoma operated on by the same surgeon between 1987 and 2002. Methods: The cumulative recurrence rate of cholesteatoma during a 5-year follow-up period was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: The overall 5-year recurrence rate was 11.8%. The recurrence rate increased with the follow-up time. The 5-year recurrence rate was 3.9% in patients treated with canal wall down tympanoplasty (CWDT) and 16.7% in patients treated with intact canal wall tympanoplasty (ICWT) or canal wall reconstruction (CWR) after CWDT with a significant difference (p < 0.01). The 5-year recurrence rate was 26.0% in patients operated on between 1987 and 1996 and 0.7% in patients operated on between 1997 and 2002, again with a significant difference (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis should be used for calculating the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma. Although this analytic method further demonstrates that CWDT is a more reliable surgical method than ICWT/CWR in reducing cholesteatoma recurrence, clinical judgment should be exercised, and we continue to recommend that a flexible approach should be adopted in deciding whether to perform CWDT or ICWT/CWR for individual cases.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 806
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] AUSTIN DF, 1989, AM J OTOL, V10, P419
  • [2] Chauvin P, 1997, AM J OTOL, V18, P550
  • [3] CHOLESTEATOMA IN CHILDREN - RECURRENCE RELATED TO OBSERVATION PERIOD
    LAU, T
    TOS, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1987, 8 (06) : 364 - 375
  • [4] Mishiro Y, 2000, Auris Nasus Larynx, V27, P223, DOI 10.1016/S0385-8146(00)00059-6
  • [5] CHOLESTEATOMA IN CHILDREN
    PALVA, A
    KARMA, P
    KARJA, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1977, 103 (02) : 74 - 77
  • [6] ROSENFELD RM, 1992, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V118, P384
  • [7] SEMIDT H, 1991, AM J OTOL, V12, P83
  • [8] Surgical treatment of pediatric cholesteatomas
    Shirazi, Mobeen A.
    Muzaffar, Kamil
    Leonetti, John P.
    Marzo, Sam
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2006, 116 (09) : 1603 - 1607
  • [9] Recurrence of attic cholesteatoma: Different methods of estimating recurrence rates
    Stangerup, SE
    Drozdziewicz, D
    Tos, M
    Hougaard-Jensen, A
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2000, 123 (03) : 283 - 287
  • [10] LONG-TERM RESULTS OF SURGERY FOR CHILDHOOD CHOLESTEATOMA
    VARTIAINEN, E
    NUUTINEN, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 1992, 24 (03) : 201 - 208