Students' language use for co-construction of knowledge in CLIL group-work activities: a comparison with L1 settings

被引:10
作者
Pastrana, Amanda [1 ]
Llinares, Ana [1 ]
Pascual, Irene [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Filosofia & Letras, Dept Filol Inglesa, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ERZIEHUNGSWISSENSCHAFT | 2018年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词
CLIL; Co-construction of knowledge; Group work; Peer interaction;
D O I
10.1007/s11618-017-0802-y
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The role of classroom interaction in CLIL has been addressed in many recent studies. However, most of the existing research has mainly focused on teacher-fronted lessons. The present study aims to analyse and compare students' language use and co-construction of knowledge during group work activities in CLIL and L1 history classes. In order to obtain comparable data, the same prompt for group discussion was used in both contexts. The data were analysed by means of a multi-level methodological approach including two layers: interaction and register. The main finding reveals that CLIL students seem to work more collaboratively than L1 students. They co-construct knowledge by building on and challenging each other's ideas, meeting the requirements of exploratory talk, in which students are critically and constructively engaged.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 70
页数:22
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, LEARNING TEACHING LA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, EXPLORING TALK SCH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Discourseand language learning across L2 instructionalsettings, DOI DOI 10.1163/9789401208598_007
[4]   Towards a cross-linguistic pedagogy Biliteracy and reciprocal learning strategies in French immersion [J].
Ballinger, Susan .
JOURNAL OF IMMERSION AND CONTENT-BASED LANGUAGE EDUCATION, 2013, 1 (01) :131-148
[5]  
Barnes D., 1992, COMMUNICATION CURRIC, V2nd
[6]  
Bieri T., 2009, WISSENSERWERB CONTEN
[7]  
Buchholz B., 2007, EMPIRICAL PERSPECTIV, P51
[8]   QUESTIONING IN CLASSROOMS - A SOCIOLINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE [J].
CARLSEN, WS .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 61 (02) :157-178
[9]  
Christie F., 2002, Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective
[10]  
Coyle D., 2010, CONTENT LANGUAGE INT