Spatial summation properties of the human ocular following response (OFR): Dependence upon the spatial frequency of the stimulus

被引:14
作者
Sheliga, B. M. [1 ]
Quaia, C. [1 ]
Cumming, B. G. [1 ]
FitzGibbon, E. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] NEI, Sensorimotor Res Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Visual motion; Averaging; Inhibition; Normalization; BEHAVIORAL RECEPTIVE-FIELD; VERGENCE EYE-MOVEMENTS; MACAQUE V1 NEURONS; VISUAL AREA MT; MOTION DETECTORS; ENERGY; CORTEX; NORMALIZATION; MONKEYS; CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Ocular following responses (OFRs) are the initial tracking eye movements that can be elicited at ultra-short latency by sudden motion of a textured pattern. The OFR magnitude depends upon stimulus size, and also upon the spatial frequency (SF) of sine-wave gratings. Here we investigate the interaction of size and SF. We recorded initial OFRs in human subjects when 1D vertical sine-wave gratings were subject to horizontal motion. Gratings were restricted to elongated horizontal apertures-"strips"-aligned with the axis of motion. In Experiment 1 the SF and the height of a single strip was manipulated. The magnitude of the OFR increased with strip height up to some optimum value, while strip heights greater than this optimum produced smaller responses. This effect was strongly dependent on SF: the optimum strip height was smaller for higher SFs. In order to explore the underlying mechanism, Experiment 2 measured OFRs to stimuli composed of two thin horizontal strips-one in the upper visual field, the other in the lower visual field-whose vertical separation varied 32-fold. Stimuli of different sizes can be reconstructed from the sum of such horizontal strips. We found that the OFRs in Experiment 1 were smaller than the sum of the responses to the component stimuli, but greater than the average of those responses. We defined an averaging coefficient that described whether a given response was closer to the sum or to the average. For any one SF, the averaging coefficients were similar over a wide range of stimulus sizes, while they varied considerably (7-fold) for stimuli of different SFs. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   SPATIOTEMPORAL ENERGY MODELS FOR THE PERCEPTION OF MOTION [J].
ADELSON, EH ;
BERGEN, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1985, 2 (02) :284-299
[2]   SPATIAL SUMMATION PROPERTIES OF DIRECTIONALLY SELECTIVE MECHANISMS IN HUMAN VISION [J].
ANDERSON, SJ ;
BURR, DC .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1991, 8 (08) :1330-1339
[3]   Behavioral receptive field for ocular following in humans:: Dynamics of spatial summation and center-surround interactions [J].
Barthelemy, Frederic V. ;
Vanzetta, Ivo ;
Masson, Guillaume S. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 95 (06) :3712-3726
[4]   Structure and function of visual area MT [J].
Born, RT ;
Bradley, DC .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 28 :157-189
[5]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[6]   SUMMATION AND DIVISION BY NEURONS IN PRIMATE VISUAL-CORTEX [J].
CARANDINI, M ;
HEEGER, DJ .
SCIENCE, 1994, 264 (5163) :1333-1336
[7]  
Carandini M, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P8621
[8]   Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons [J].
Cavanaugh, JR ;
Bair, W ;
Movshon, JA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 88 (05) :2530-2546
[9]   PRECISE RECORDING OF HUMAN EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
COLLEWIJN, H ;
VANDERMARK, F ;
JANSEN, TC .
VISION RESEARCH, 1975, 15 (03) :447-&
[10]  
DeValois R.L., 1988, SPATIAL VISION