Hippocampal activation during episodic and semantic memory retrieval: Comparing category production and category cued recall

被引:96
作者
Ryan, Lee [1 ]
Cox, Christine [1 ]
Hayes, Scott M. [2 ]
Nadel, Lynn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Psychol, Cognit Neuroimaging Labs, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
hippocampus; semantic memory; category production; episodic memory; fMRI; verbal fluency;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.030
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Whether or not the hippocampus participates in semantic memory retrieval has been the focus of much debate in the literature. However, few neuroimaging studies have directly compared hippocampal activation during semantic and episodic retrieval tasks that are well matched in all respects other than the source of the retrieved information. In Experiment 1, we compared hippocampal fMRI activation during a classic semantic memory task, category production, and an episodic version of the same task, category cued recall. Left hippocampal activation was observed in both episodic and semantic conditions, although other regions of the brain clearly distinguished the two tasks. interestingly, participants reported using retrieval strategies during the semantic retrieval task that relied on autobiographical and spatial information; for example, visualizing themselves in their kitchen while producing items for the category kitchen utensils. In Experiment 2, we considered whether the use of these spatial and autobiographical retrieval strategies could have accounted for the hippocampal activation observed in Experiment 1. Categories were presented that elicited one of three retrieval strategy types, autobiographical and spatial, autobiographical and nonspatial, and neither autobiographical nor spatial. Once again, similar hippocampal activation was observed for all three category types, regardless of the inclusion of spatial or autobiographical content. We conclude that the distinction between semantic and episodic memory is more complex than classic memory models suggest. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2109 / 2121
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration [J].
Addis, Donna Rose ;
Wong, Alana T. ;
Schacter, Daniel L. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2007, 45 (07) :1363-1377
[2]  
Andrewes D, 2001, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY THEO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1932, REMEMBERING
[4]  
Ashburner J, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V7, P254, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:4<254::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-G
[6]   Role of frontal versus temporal cortex in verbal fluency as revealed by voxel-based lesion symptom mapping [J].
Baldo, Juliana V. ;
Schwartz, Sophie ;
Wilkins, David ;
Dronkers, Nina F. .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 12 (06) :896-900
[7]  
Barsalou L.W., 1988, REMEMBERING RECONSID, P193, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511664014.009, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511664014.009, 10.1017/CBO9780511664014]
[8]   Basing categorization on individuals and events [J].
Barsalou, LW ;
Huttenlocher, J .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 36 (03) :203-272
[9]   AD HOC CATEGORIES [J].
BARSALOU, LW .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1983, 11 (03) :211-227
[10]   CONTRASTING THE REPRESENTATION OF SCRIPTS AND CATEGORIES [J].
BARSALOU, LW ;
SEWELL, DR .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1985, 24 (06) :646-665