Complementing clinical cancer registry data with patient reported outcomes: A feasibility study on routine electronic patient-reported outcome assessment for the Austrian Myelome Registry

被引:15
|
作者
Sztankay, Monika [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Neppl, Lucia [2 ]
Wintner, Lisa M. [1 ,3 ]
Loth, Fanny L. [2 ]
Willenbacher, Wolfgang [4 ,5 ]
Weger, Roman [5 ]
Weyrer, Walpurga [4 ]
Steurer, Michael [4 ]
Rumpold, Gerhard [1 ]
Holzner, Bernhard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[2] Univ Innsbruck Hosp, Psychiat 2, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[3] Univ Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[4] Univ Innsbruck Hosp, Internal Med Haematol & Oncol 5, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[5] Oncotyrol Ctr Personalized Canc Med, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
cancer registry; clinical routine; electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring; health-related quality of life; implementation; multiple myeloma; QUALITY; CARE; SURVEILLANCE; RATIONALE; SYMPTOMS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1111/ecc.13154
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives Routinely assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life (QOL), are important to supplement clinical cancer data but requires rigorous implementation. This study aims at depicting the implementation procedure and evaluating the feasibility of routine electronic PRO monitoring (ePRO) for collecting data supplementing the Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR). Methods Integration of ePRO monitoring into clinical routine was planned according to the Replicating Effective Programs framework. QOL data were assessed regularly during treatment and aftercare at the hematooncological outpatient unit at the Medical University of Innsbruck with the EORTC QLQ-C30/ +MY20 and the EQ-5D-5L. Feasibility and usability testing were performed via a multimethod approach. Results Within the first year, 94.4% of the MM patients (N = 142, mean age 65.4, SD 11.8, 60% male) provided 748 PRO assessment time points overall. Patients and clinicians were satisfied with ePRO monitoring and indicated no to little disruption in clinical routine. Patient preference on assessment time points and completion frequency became evident. Conclusions Complementing the AMR with ePRO data proved to be feasible. Our findings provide useful insights for healthcare providers considering introducing ePRO monitoring to their units for informing clinical registries as well as individualised feedback to patients alike.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) application for patients with prostate cancer
    Mohseni, Majid
    Ayatollahi, Haleh
    Arefpour, Amir Mohammad
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [32] Leveraging patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with pancreatic cancer: The Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) online patient registry experience
    Gupta, Arjun
    Khalid, Omar
    Moravek, Cassadie
    Lamkin, Anica
    Matrisian, Lynn M.
    Doss, Sudheer
    Denlinger, Crystal S.
    Coveler, Andrew L.
    Weekes, Colin D.
    Roeland, Eric J.
    Hendifar, Andrew E.
    Nipp, Ryan D.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (20): : 7152 - 7161
  • [33] Evaluating cancer patient-reported outcome measures: Readability and implications for clinical use
    Papadakos, Janet K.
    Charow, Rebecca C.
    Papadakos, Christine J.
    Moody, Lesley J.
    Giuliani, Meredith E.
    CANCER, 2019, 125 (08) : 1350 - 1356
  • [34] Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 8: patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records can inform clinical and policy decisions
    Ahmed, Sara
    Ware, Patrick
    Gardner, William
    Witter, James
    Bingham, Clifton O., III
    Kairy, Dahlia
    Bartlett, Susan J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 89 : 160 - 167
  • [35] Implementing paediatric patient-reported outcome measures in outpatient asthma clinics: a feasibility assessment study
    Bele, Sumedh
    Paolucci, Elizabeth Oddone
    Johnson, David W.
    Quan, Hude
    Santana, Maria-Jose
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [36] Malnutrition in Head and Neck Cancer: A Patient-reported Outcome Study
    Cofre, Andreas
    Walter, Stefanie
    Buentzel, Jens
    Huebner, Jutta
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (04) : 1663 - 1673
  • [37] The Development and Feasibility of a Novel Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Eproms) Questionnaire in patients with penile cancer
    Adegboye, Oluwatobi
    Churchill, James
    Moorjani, John
    Johnson, Helen
    Capper, Sharon
    Booker, Jane
    Parnham, Arie
    Lau, Maurice
    Sangar, Vijay
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2024, 22 (05)
  • [38] Chinese multicentre prospective registry of breast cancer patient-reported outcome-reconstruction and oncoplastic cohort (PRO-ROC): a study protocol
    Li, Lun
    Yang, Benlong
    Li, Hongyuan
    Yin, Jian
    Jin, Feng
    Han, Siyuan
    Liao, Ning
    Shi, Jingping
    Ling, Rui
    Li, Zan
    Ouyang, Lizhi
    Wang, Xiang
    Fu, Peifen
    Ouyang, Zhong
    Ma, Binlin
    Wu, Xinhong
    Wang, Haibo
    Liu, Jian
    Shao, Zhimin
    Wu, Jiong
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [39] Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective
    Nielsen, Amalie Sogaard
    Appel, Charlotte W.
    Larsen, Birgit Furstrand
    Hanna, Lisa
    Kayser, Lars
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [40] How Should Oncologists Choose an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Remote Monitoring of Patients With Cancer?
    Denis, Fabrice
    Krakowski, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (09)