Complementing clinical cancer registry data with patient reported outcomes: A feasibility study on routine electronic patient-reported outcome assessment for the Austrian Myelome Registry

被引:15
|
作者
Sztankay, Monika [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Neppl, Lucia [2 ]
Wintner, Lisa M. [1 ,3 ]
Loth, Fanny L. [2 ]
Willenbacher, Wolfgang [4 ,5 ]
Weger, Roman [5 ]
Weyrer, Walpurga [4 ]
Steurer, Michael [4 ]
Rumpold, Gerhard [1 ]
Holzner, Bernhard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[2] Univ Innsbruck Hosp, Psychiat 2, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[3] Univ Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[4] Univ Innsbruck Hosp, Internal Med Haematol & Oncol 5, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[5] Oncotyrol Ctr Personalized Canc Med, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
cancer registry; clinical routine; electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring; health-related quality of life; implementation; multiple myeloma; QUALITY; CARE; SURVEILLANCE; RATIONALE; SYMPTOMS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1111/ecc.13154
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives Routinely assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life (QOL), are important to supplement clinical cancer data but requires rigorous implementation. This study aims at depicting the implementation procedure and evaluating the feasibility of routine electronic PRO monitoring (ePRO) for collecting data supplementing the Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR). Methods Integration of ePRO monitoring into clinical routine was planned according to the Replicating Effective Programs framework. QOL data were assessed regularly during treatment and aftercare at the hematooncological outpatient unit at the Medical University of Innsbruck with the EORTC QLQ-C30/ +MY20 and the EQ-5D-5L. Feasibility and usability testing were performed via a multimethod approach. Results Within the first year, 94.4% of the MM patients (N = 142, mean age 65.4, SD 11.8, 60% male) provided 748 PRO assessment time points overall. Patients and clinicians were satisfied with ePRO monitoring and indicated no to little disruption in clinical routine. Patient preference on assessment time points and completion frequency became evident. Conclusions Complementing the AMR with ePRO data proved to be feasible. Our findings provide useful insights for healthcare providers considering introducing ePRO monitoring to their units for informing clinical registries as well as individualised feedback to patients alike.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Hematology Cancer Care
    Kirkpatrick, Suriya
    Campbell, Karen
    Harding, Samantha
    Rudd, Sarah
    CANCER NURSING, 2024,
  • [12] Incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into a clinical quality registry (CQR) for ovarian cancer: considerations and challenges
    Lefkovits, Yael R.
    Heriot, Natalie
    Sporik, Alice
    Perera, Sharnel
    Friedlander, Michael
    Dixon, Cyril
    Cohen, Paul A.
    Lee, Yeh Chen
    Hyde, Simon
    Richardson, Gary
    Webb, Penelope
    Rome, Robert
    King, Madeleine
    Zalcberg, John
    Schofield, Penelope
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [13] Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice
    不详
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2012, 62 (05) : 336 - 347
  • [14] Patient-reported outcomes in cancer cachexia clinical trials
    Wheelwright, Sally J.
    Johnson, Colin D.
    Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, 2015, 9 (04) : 325 - 332
  • [15] Electronic Patient-reported Outcomes During Breast Cancer Adjuvant Radiotherapy
    Takala, Laura
    Kuusinen, Tuuli-Elina
    Skytta, Tanja
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko-Liisa
    Barlund, Maarit
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2021, 21 (03) : E252 - E270
  • [16] Improving patient outcomes through the routine use of patient-reported data in cancer clinics: future directions
    Luckett, T.
    Butow, P. N.
    King, M. T.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (11) : 1129 - 1138
  • [17] Routine patient assessment and the use of patient-reported outcomes in specialized palliative care in Japan
    Ito, Nao
    Ishii, Yoko
    Aoyama, Maho
    Abo, Hirofumi
    Sakashita, Akihiro
    Matsumura, Yuko
    Miyashita, Mitsunori
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [18] Implementation of patient-reported outcome assessment in routine cancer care: A systematic review of multicentric programs in Europe
    Scheibe, Madlen
    Herrmann, Alina
    Schmitt, Jochen
    Einhart, Natascha
    Sedlmayra, Brita
    Kowalski, Christoph
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2020, 156-157 : 11 - 23
  • [19] Patient and clinician-reported experiences of using electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) as part of routine cancer care
    Payne, Amelia
    Horne, Ashley
    Bayman, Neil
    Blackhall, Fiona
    Bostock, Layla
    Chan, Clara
    Coote, Joanna
    Eaton, Marie
    Fenemore, Jacqueline
    Gomes, Fabio
    Halkyard, Emma
    Harris, Margaret
    Lindsay, Colin
    McEntee, Delyth
    Neal, Hilary
    Pemberton, Laura
    Sheikh, Hamid
    Woolf, David
    Price, James
    Yorke, Janelle
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [20] Exploring patient reported quality of life in lung cancer patients: A qualitative study of patient-reported outcome measures
    Jensen-Marini, Elena
    Ayton, Darshini
    Zalcberg, John
    Stirling, Robert G.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 21 (02) : 163 - 173