Assessment of Surgical Learning Curves in Transoral Robotic Surgery for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx

被引:30
|
作者
Albergotti, William G. [1 ]
Gooding, William E. [2 ]
Kubik, Mark W. [1 ]
Geltzeiler, Mathew [1 ]
Kim, Seungwon [1 ]
Duvvuri, Umamaheswar [1 ,3 ]
Ferris, Robert L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Canc Inst, Biostat Facil, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Vet Affairs Pittsburgh Hlth Syst, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
NECK-SURGERY; CANCER; HEAD; EXPERIENCE; CUSUM;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoto.2016.4132
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is increasingly employed as a treatment option for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (OPSCC). Measures of surgical learning curves are needed particularly as clinical trials using this technology continue to evolve. OBJECTIVE To assess learning curves for the oncologic TORS surgeon and to identify the number of cases needed to identify the learning phase. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective review of all patients who underwent TORS for OPSCC at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between March 2010 and March 2016. Cases were excluded for involvement of a subsite outside of the oropharynx, for nonmalignant abnormality or nonsquamous histology, unknown primary, no tumor in the main specimen, free flap reconstruction, and for an inability to define margin status. EXPOSURES Transoral robotic surgery for OPSCC. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary learning measures defined by the authors include the initial and final margin status and time to resection of main surgical specimen. A cumulative sum learning curve was developed for each surgeon for each of the study variables. The inflection point of each surgeon's curve was considered to be the point signaling the completion of the learning phase. RESULTS There were 382 transoral robotic procedures identified. Of 382 cases, 160 met our inclusion criteria: 68 for surgeon A, 37 for surgeon B, and 55 for surgeon C. Of the 160 included patients, 125 were men and 35 were women. The mean (SD) age of participants was 59.4 (9.5) years. Mean (SD) time to resection including robot set-up was 79 (36) minutes. The inflection points for the final margin status learning curves were 27 cases (surgeon A) and 25 cases (surgeon C). There was no inflection point for surgeon B for final margin status. Inflection points for mean time to resection were: 39 cases (surgeon A), 30 cases (surgeon B), and 27 cases (surgeon C). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Using metrics of positive margin rate and time to resection of the main surgical specimen, the learning curve for TORS for OPSCC is surgeon-specific. Inflection points for most learning curves peak between 20 and 30 cases.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 548
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Surgical Anatomy of Oropharynx and Supraglottic Larynx for Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Gun, Ramazan
    Ozer, Enver
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 112 (07) : 690 - 696
  • [12] Ten-Year Efficacy of Transoral Surgery for Squamous Carcinoma of the Lateral Oropharynx
    Laccourreye, Ollivier
    Garcia, Dominique
    Rahman, Arifeen
    Holsinger, F. C.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (11) : 4564 - 4572
  • [13] The Role of Transoral Robotic Surgery in the Management of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Current Review
    Sansoni, E. Ritter
    Gross, Neil D.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (03)
  • [14] Feeding Tube Placement Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Feng, Allen L.
    Holcomb, Andrew J.
    Abt, Nicholas B.
    Mokhtari, Tara E.
    Suresh, Krish
    McHugh, Christopher, I
    Parikh, Anuraag S.
    Holman, Allison
    Kammer, Rachael E.
    Goldsmith, Tessa A.
    Faden, Daniel L.
    Deschler, Daniel G.
    Varvares, Mark A.
    Lin, Derrick T.
    Richmon, Jeremy D.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2022, 166 (04) : 696 - 703
  • [15] The Role of Transoral Robotic Surgery in the Management of HPV Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Sload, Ryan
    Silver, Natalie
    Jawad, Basit Abjul
    Gross, Neil D.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 18 (09)
  • [16] Transoral robotic surgery versus conventional surgery in treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract
    Hammoudi, Karim
    Pinlong, Eric
    Kim, Soo
    Bakhos, David
    Moriniere, Sylvain
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2015, 37 (09): : 1304 - 1309
  • [17] National Trends in 30-Day Readmission Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Nyirjesy, Sarah C.
    McCrary, Hilary C.
    Zhao, Songzhu
    Judd, Ryan T.
    Farlow, Janice L.
    Seim, Nolan B.
    Ozer, Enver
    Agrawal, Amit
    Old, Matthew O.
    Rocco, James W.
    Kang, Stephen Y.
    Haring, Catherine T.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 150 (02) : 133 - 141
  • [18] Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a scoping review of novel techniques in margin assessment
    Goel, Sahil
    Krishnan, Giri
    Krishnan, Suren
    Hodge, John-Charles
    Foreman, Andrew
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 7
  • [19] Analysis of readmissions after transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
    Parhar, Harman S.
    Gausden, Elizabeth
    Patel, Jayendrakumar
    Prisman, Eitan
    Anderson, Donald W.
    Durham, J. Scott
    Rush, Barret
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2018, 40 (11): : 2416 - 2423
  • [20] Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the era of human papillomavirus
    Mahmoud, Omar
    Sung, Kim
    Civantos, Francisco J.
    Thomas, Giovanna R.
    Samuels, Michael A.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2018, 40 (04): : 710 - 721