An analysis of the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative implementation process

被引:27
作者
Lujala, Paivi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Geog Res Unit, PL 8000, Oulu 90014, Finland
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Geog, Trondheim, Norway
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
EITI; Natural resource management; Ordered multiple failure data; Survival analysis; Global dataset; Impact evaluation; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; CIVIL-SOCIETY; EITI; CORRUPTION; GOVERNANCE; SECTOR; AZERBAIJAN; GOVERNMENT; DISCLOSURE; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.030
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) has become an international hallmark of the efforts to promote better extractive-sector management and improved societal development in natural resource-rich countries. Since its establishment in 2003, a large number of resource-dependent countries have committed to the EITI Standard, and support of the EITI from donors, nongovernmental organizations, and extractive industry companies has been vast. To understand whether and how adherence to the EITI Standard can affect resource governance and development, it is crucial to examine what factors influence a country's decision to join and implement the Standard. This article examines why and how rapidly countries adopt the Standard using survival analysis methods and a global dataset on countries' progress in implementing the EITI Standard. It finds that several factors influence progress and proposes that these can be categorized as internal motivation, internal capacity, and external pressure to implement the Standard. This article contributes to understanding why the EITI Standard implementation stalls in some countries whereas it progresses in others. Importantly, it outlines which factors need to be controlled for in studies that seek to evaluate the impact of the EITI on resource governance and societal development, and argues that such impact evaluations need to correct for the selection biases in countries' decisions to commit to and implement the EITI Standard. (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 381
页数:24
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: BUSINESS, GOVERNMENT, CIVIL SOCIETY, AND THE PUBLIC IN THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES TRANSPARENCY INITIATIVE (EITI) [J].
Aaronson, Susan Ariel .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 31 (01) :50-63
[2]   Modelling recurrent events: a tutorial for analysis in epidemiology [J].
Amorim, Leila D. A. F. ;
Cai, Jianwen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (01) :324-333
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EITI STAND 2016
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, WORLD DEV INDICATORS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, World Economic Outlook Databases
[6]   Explaining diverse national responses to the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in the Andes: What sort of politics matters? [J].
Bebbington, Anthony ;
Arond, Elisa ;
Dammert, Juan Luis .
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2017, 4 (04) :833-841
[7]   Global and Local Policy Responses to the Resource Trap [J].
Carbonnier, Gilles ;
Brugger, Fritz ;
Krause, Jana .
GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, 2011, 17 (02) :247-264
[8]   The effects of increased revenue transparency in the extractives sector: The case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative [J].
Corrigan, Caitlin C. .
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY, 2017, 4 (04) :779-787
[9]   Breaking the resource curse: Transparency in the natural resource sector and the extractive industries transparency initiative [J].
Corrigan, Caitlin C. .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2014, 40 :17-30
[10]   Norm Diffusion and Reputation: The Rise of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative [J].
David-Barrett, Elizabeth ;
Okamura, Ken .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2016, 29 (02) :227-246