Evaluating Performance of Photographs for Marine Citizen Science Applications

被引:13
|
作者
Newcomer, Katherine [1 ]
Tracy, Brianna M. [1 ]
Chang, Andrew L. [2 ]
Ruiz, Gregory M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Smithsonian Environm Res Ctr, Marine Invas Lab, POB 28, Edgewater, MD 21037 USA
[2] Smithsonian Environm Res Ctr, Marine Invas Lab, Tiburon, CA USA
关键词
photographic methods; marine; invertebrates; non-native; citizen science; taxonomy; BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS; FOULING COMMUNITY; ESTUARINE; PATTERNS; CALIFORNIA; HISTORY; SCIENTISTS; VALIDATION; STABILITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2019.00336
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Long-term measurements are imperative to detect, understand, and predict changes in coastal biological communities, but can be both costly and difficult to implement. Here, we compare measurement methods used to document community structure and assess changes in marine systems, and explore potential applications in citizen science. The use of photographs for species identifications and monitoring has become a popular and useful data collection tool, but its use requires evaluation of its effectiveness in comparison to data collected from live examinations. We used settlement panels in San Francisco Bay, a well-studied and vital coastal ecosystem, to compare standardized measures of the invertebrate fouling community through examination of live organisms in the field and via photographs. Overall, our study found that live measurements were more accurate and better represented these marine communities, having higher richness, and diversity measurements than photographic measurements. However, photographic analyses accurately captured the relative abundances of some species and functional groups. We suggest that highly recognizable target taxa or broad scale comparisons of functional group composition are easily tracked through photographs and offer the best potential for research conducted by citizen scientists.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating Population Estimates of Mountain Goats Based on Citizen Science
    Belt, Jami J.
    Krausman, Paul R.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2012, 36 (02): : 264 - 276
  • [32] Citizen science in ecology: a place for humans in nature
    Adler, Frederick R.
    Green, Austin M.
    Sekercioglu, Cagan H.
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2020, 1469 (01) : 52 - 64
  • [33] Citizen science data are a reliable complement to quantitative ecological assessments in urban rivers
    Krabbenhoft, Corey A.
    Kashian, Donna R.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 116
  • [34] Evaluating citizen science projects: insights from radon research
    Hoedoafia, Mabel Akosua
    Martell, Meritxell
    Perko, Tanja
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 12
  • [35] CITIZEN SCIENCE FOR GNSS PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
    Filjar, Renato
    Sikirica, Nenad
    Borges, Renato Alves
    9TH ANNUAL BASKA GNSS CONFERENCE, 2015, : 7 - 18
  • [36] Monitoring Citizen Science Performance: Methodological Guidelines
    Skarzauskiene, Aelita
    Angelidou, Margarita
    Politis, Christos
    Roma-Athanasiadou, Elli
    Maciuliene, Monika
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS, 2024, 18 (01) : 67 - 86
  • [37] The Citizen Science Paradox
    Bergerot, Benjamin
    LAND, 2022, 11 (08)
  • [38] (Un)theorizing citizen science: Investigation of theories applied to citizen science studies
    Hajibayova, Lala
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 71 (08) : 916 - 926
  • [39] A Review of Citizen Science and Crowdsourcing in Applications of Pluvial Flooding
    See, Linda
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2019, 7
  • [40] Overview of Data Storing Techniques in Citizen Science Applications
    Musto, Jiri
    Dahanayake, Ajantha
    NEW TRENDS IN DATABASES AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, ADBIS 2018, 2018, 909 : 231 - 241