Presentation modality influences behavioral measures of alerting, orienting, and executive control

被引:40
作者
Roberts, Katherine L.
Summerfield, A. Quentin
Hall, Deborah A.
机构
[1] MRC, Inst Hearing Res, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ York, Dept Psychol, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
auditory perception; visual perception; attention; cues; Attention Network Test; ANT;
D O I
10.1017/S1355617706060620
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The Attention Network Test (ANT) uses visual stimuli to separately assess the attentional skills of alerting (improved performance following a warning cue), spatial orienting (an additional benefit when the warning cue also cues target location), and executive control (impaired performance when a target stimulus contains conflicting information). This study contrasted performance on auditory and visual versions of the ANT to determine whether the measures it obtains are influenced by presentation modality. Forty healthy volunteers completed both auditory and visual tests. Reaction-time measures of executive control were of a similar magnitude and significantly correlated, suggesting that executive control might be a supramodal resource. Measures of alerting were also comparable across tasks. In contrast, spatial-orienting benefits were obtained only in the visual task. Auditory spatial cues did not improve response times to auditory targets presented at the cued location. The different spatial-orienting measures could reflect either separate orienting resources for each perceptual modality, or an interaction between a supramodal orienting resource and modality-specific perceptual processing.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 492
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   Activation by attention of the human reticular formation and thalamic intralaminar nuclei [J].
Kinomura, S ;
Larsson, J ;
Gulyas, B ;
Roland, PE .
SCIENCE, 1996, 271 (5248) :512-515
[22]   HALF A CENTURY OF RESEARCH ON THE STROOP EFFECT - AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW [J].
MACLEOD, CM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 109 (02) :163-203
[23]   2-DIMENSIONAL SOUND LOCALIZATION BY HUMAN LISTENERS [J].
MAKOUS, JC ;
MIDDLEBROOKS, JC .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (05) :2188-2200
[24]  
Marrocco RT, 1998, ATTENTIVE BRAIN, P35
[25]   The neural networks underlying endogenous auditory covert orienting and reorienting [J].
Mayer, AR ;
Harrington, D ;
Adair, JC ;
Lee, R .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 30 (03) :938-949
[26]   STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY AFFECTS AUDITORY STROOP INTERFERENCE [J].
MCCLAIN, L .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1983, 33 (03) :266-270
[27]   Spatial relevance determines facilitatory and inhibitory effects of auditory covert spatial orienting [J].
McDonald, JJ ;
Ward, LM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1999, 25 (05) :1234-1252
[28]   Alerting, orienting, and executive attention: Developmental properties and sociodemographic correlates in an epidemiological sample of young, urban children [J].
Mezzacappa, E .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 75 (05) :1373-1386
[29]   SHIFTING AND FOCUSING AUDITORY SPATIAL ATTENTION [J].
MONDOR, TA ;
ZATORRE, RJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (02) :387-409
[30]   ALLOCATING ATTENTION TO FREQUENCY REGIONS [J].
MONDOR, TA ;
BREGMAN, AS .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 56 (03) :268-276