Presentation modality influences behavioral measures of alerting, orienting, and executive control

被引:40
作者
Roberts, Katherine L.
Summerfield, A. Quentin
Hall, Deborah A.
机构
[1] MRC, Inst Hearing Res, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ York, Dept Psychol, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
auditory perception; visual perception; attention; cues; Attention Network Test; ANT;
D O I
10.1017/S1355617706060620
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The Attention Network Test (ANT) uses visual stimuli to separately assess the attentional skills of alerting (improved performance following a warning cue), spatial orienting (an additional benefit when the warning cue also cues target location), and executive control (impaired performance when a target stimulus contains conflicting information). This study contrasted performance on auditory and visual versions of the ANT to determine whether the measures it obtains are influenced by presentation modality. Forty healthy volunteers completed both auditory and visual tests. Reaction-time measures of executive control were of a similar magnitude and significantly correlated, suggesting that executive control might be a supramodal resource. Measures of alerting were also comparable across tasks. In contrast, spatial-orienting benefits were obtained only in the visual task. Auditory spatial cues did not improve response times to auditory targets presented at the cued location. The different spatial-orienting measures could reflect either separate orienting resources for each perceptual modality, or an interaction between a supramodal orienting resource and modality-specific perceptual processing.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 492
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Selection, integration, and conflict monitoring: Assessing the nature and generality of prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms [J].
Badre, D ;
Wagner, AD .
NEURON, 2004, 41 (03) :473-487
[2]   TIME FOR REORIENTING OF ATTENTION - A PREMOTOR HYPOTHESIS OF THE UNDERLYING MECHANISM [J].
BEDARD, MA ;
ELMASSIOUI, F ;
PILLON, B ;
NANDRINO, JL .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1993, 31 (03) :241-249
[3]   SPATIAL-MAPPING OF INTRACRANIAL AUDITORY EVENTS FOR VARIOUS DEGREES OF INTERAURAL COHERENCE [J].
BLAUERT, J ;
LINDEMANN, W .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1986, 79 (03) :806-813
[4]   SPATIAL ATTENTIONAL SHIFTS - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF POLYSENSORY MECHANISMS [J].
BUCHTEL, HA ;
BUTTER, CM .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1988, 26 (04) :499-509
[5]   Effects of stimulus source and intensity on covert orientation to auditory stimuli [J].
Buchtel, HA ;
Butter, CM ;
Ayvasik, B .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1996, 34 (10) :979-985
[6]   The three attentional networks:: On their independence and interactions [J].
Callejas, A ;
Lupiáñez, J ;
Tudela, P .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2004, 54 (03) :225-227
[7]  
COWAN J, 2005, 28 MIDW RES M ASS RE
[8]   Neglect between but not within auditory objects [J].
Cusack, R ;
Carlyon, RP ;
Robertson, IH .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 (06) :1056-1065
[9]   EFFECTS OF NOISE LETTERS UPON IDENTIFICATION OF A TARGET LETTER IN A NONSEARCH TASK [J].
ERIKSEN, BA ;
ERIKSEN, CW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (01) :143-149
[10]   Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks [J].
Fan, J ;
McCandliss, BD ;
Sommer, T ;
Raz, A ;
Posner, MI .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 14 (03) :340-347