Optimization schemes for grassland ecosystem services under climate change

被引:18
作者
Hao, Ruifang [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Deyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Coll Resources Sci & Technol,CHESS, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Soil & Water Conservat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Arid and semiarid area; Tradeoff; Scenario simulation; Grazing intensity; Optimization; Sustainability; INNER-MONGOLIA; CHINA; MODEL; SENSITIVITY; BIOMASS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.012
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem and associated services in arid and semiarid areas are sensitive to climate change and human activities. Guiding human activities based on the optimization of ecosystem services can help humans adapt to climate change effectively, which is vital for regional sustainability. We evaluated the distribution of five ecosystem services: net primary productivity (NPP), soil conservation (SC), water yield (WY), water retention (WR), and livestock supply in the grassland and agro-pastoral transitional zone of China (GAPTZ) under the future climate scenarios of representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and RCP8.5 in 2050. We designed the four grazing-intensity scenarios of ungrazed (UG), lightly grazed (LG), moderately grazed (MG), and heavily grazed (HG) and analyzed the impacts of climate change and grazing on the ecosystem services. Finally, we presented the optimization schemes of grazing intensity in the GAPTZ under the objectives of "strong sustainability" and "weak sustainability". "Strong sustainability" objective means that the total change rate of ecosystem services compared to the ungrazed scenario is maximal and should not be less than 0. "Weak sustainability" objective means that the livestock supply is preferential and the total change rate of ecosystem services compared to the ungrazed scenario is maximal but could be less than 0. The results showed that both climate change and grazing exert great influence on the supply and interrelation of ecosystem services. In the northeast of the GAPTZ, LG and MG can stimulate grassland to tiller and enlarge ecosystem services integrally. HG has the severest negative effect on ecosystem services overall. Under the "weak sustainability" objective, LG can be widely adopted in the GAPTZ. Under the "strong sustainability" objective, grazing should be limited in the northwestern and north central GAPTZ. Reasonable planning of grazing intensity and its spatial patterns can promote effective utilization of grassland resource and realization of regional sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:1158 / 1169
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: The ES-in-Planning framework [J].
Albert, Christian ;
Galler, Carolin ;
Hermes, Johannes ;
Neuendorf, Felix ;
von Haaren, Christina ;
Lovett, Andrew .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 :100-113
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, InVEST +VERSION+ User's Guide
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, T AM SOC AGR ENG
[4]  
Bai Y. E, 2001, ACTA BOT SIN, V43, P781
[5]   Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland [J].
Bai, YF ;
Han, XG ;
Wu, JG ;
Chen, ZZ ;
Li, LH .
NATURE, 2004, 431 (7005) :181-184
[6]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404
[7]  
Bili G. T., 2004, J INNER MONGOLIA AGR, V25, P30
[8]  
Cai C., 2000, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V14, P19, DOI [DOI 10.13870/J.CNKI.STBCXB.2000.02.005, 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2000.02.005]
[9]  
Cheng J.M., 1998, RES SOIL WATER CONSE, V5, P36
[10]   Modelling interactions and feedback mechanisms between land use change and landscape processes [J].
Claessens, L. ;
Schoorl, J. M. ;
Verburg, P. H. ;
Geraedts, L. ;
Veldkamp, A. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 129 (1-3) :157-170