Combined Beef Thawing Using Response Surface Methodology

被引:4
|
作者
Jin, Jiahui [1 ]
Wang, Xiaodan [1 ]
Han, Yunxiu [1 ]
Cai, Yaoxuan [1 ]
Cai, Yingming [1 ]
Wang, Hongmei [1 ]
Zhu, Lingtao [1 ]
Xu, Liping [1 ]
Zhao, Lei [1 ]
Li, Zhiyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Coll Food Sci & Engn, Changchun 130062, Peoples R China
关键词
microwave; Box-Behnken; thaw; ultrasound; FREEZING RATE; MEAT QUALITY; FROZEN; OPTIMIZATION; ULTRASOUND; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.17221/138/2016-CJFS
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Based on four thawing methods (still air, still water, ultrasonic wave, and microwave) and single-factor tests, we established a four-factor three-level response surface methodology for a regression model (four factors: pH, drip loss rate, cooking loss rate, protein content). The optimal combined thawing method for beef rib-eye is: microwave thawing (35 s work/10 s stop, totally 170 s) until beef surfaces soften, then air thawing at 15 degrees C until the beef centre temperature reaches -8 degrees C, and finally ultrasonic thawing at 220 W until the beef centre temperature rises to 0 degrees C. With this method, the drip loss rate is 1.9003%, cooking loss rate is 33.3997%, and protein content is 229.603 mu g, which are not significantly different from the model-predicted theoretical results (P >= 0.05).
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 553
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimization of photolysis of diclofenac using a response surface methodology
    Im, Jong-Kwon
    Kim, Moon-Kyung
    Zoh, Kyung-Duk
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 67 (04) : 907 - 914
  • [32] Optimization of thermoacoustic refrigerator using response surface methodology
    HARIHARAN N. M.
    SIVASHANMUGAM P.
    KASTHURIRENGAN S.
    Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2013, 25 (01) : 72 - 82
  • [33] Optimization of concrete walls using the response surface methodology
    Yepes, Victor
    Martinez-Munoz, David
    Marti, Josi, V
    CMMOST 2019: 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL MODELS IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING (CMMOST 2019), 2019, : 603 - 615
  • [34] Optimization of Ammonia Oxidation Using Response Surface Methodology
    Inger, Marek
    Dobrzynska-Inger, Agnieszka
    Rajewski, Jakub
    Wilk, Marcin
    CATALYSTS, 2019, 9 (03):
  • [35] Optimization of thermoacoustic refrigerator using response surface methodology
    Hariharan, N. M.
    Sivashanmugam, P.
    Kasthurirengan, S.
    JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS, 2013, 25 (01) : 72 - 82
  • [36] Optimization of mead production using Response Surface Methodology
    Gomes, Teresa
    Barradas, Carla
    Dias, Teresa
    Verdial, Joao
    Morais, Jorge Sa
    Ramalhosa, Elsa
    Estevinho, Leticia M.
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 59 : 680 - 686
  • [37] Optimization of Magnetic Suspension using Response Surface Methodology
    Lim, Ho-Kyoung
    Jung, Jae-Woo
    Hong, Jung-Pyo
    INTELEC 09 - 31ST INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENERGY CONFERENCE, 2009, : 937 - 940
  • [38] The optimization of GPS positioning using response surface methodology
    Sisman, Yasemin
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2014, 7 (03) : 1223 - 1231
  • [39] Study on Biomethane Inhibition Using Response Surface Methodology
    Zhao, Tiantao
    Zhang, Lijie
    Zhao, Youcai
    2009 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-11, 2009, : 6215 - +
  • [40] The optimization of GPS positioning using response surface methodology
    Yasemin Sisman
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2014, 7 : 1223 - 1231