Prospect theory in the health domain: A quantitative assessment

被引:70
作者
Attema, Arthur E. [1 ]
Brouwer, Werner B. F. [1 ]
l'Haridon, Olivier [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, iBMG iMTA, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Rennes 1, Crem, F-35014 Rennes, France
[3] HEC Paris, Greghec, Paris, France
关键词
Loss aversion; Cumulative prospect theory; QALY model; Utility of life duration; TIME TRADE-OFF; PROBABILITY WEIGHTING FUNCTION; PARAMETER-FREE ELICITATION; LOSS AVERSION; STANDARD GAMBLE; NONEXPECTED UTILITY; LIFE-YEARS; MARGINAL UTILITY; RISK PREFERENCES; DEPENDENT MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.08.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is well-known that expected utility (EU) has empirical deficiencies. Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) has developed as an alternative with more descriptive validity. However, CPT's full function had not yet been quantified in the health domain. This paper is therefore the first to simultaneously measure utility of life duration, probability weighting, and loss aversion in this domain. We observe loss aversion and risk aversion for gains and losses, which for gains can be explained by probabilistic pessimism. Utility for gains is almost linear. For losses, we find less weighting of probability 112 and concave utility. This contrasts with the common finding of convex utility for monetary losses. However, CPT was proposed to explain choices among lotteries involving monetary outcomes. Life years are arguably very different from monetary outcomes and need not generate convex utility for losses. Moreover, utility of life duration reflects discounting, causing concave utility. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1057 / 1065
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1497-1512
[2]   A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
L'Haridon, Olivier .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2008, 36 (03) :245-266
[3]   Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Paraschiv, Corina .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (10) :1659-1674
[4]   Experienced vs. Described Uncertainty: Do We Need Two Prospect Theory Specifications? [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
L'Haridon, Olivier ;
Paraschiv, Corina .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (10) :1879-1895
[5]   Risk Preferences at Different Time Periods: An Experimental Investigation [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Diecidue, Enrico ;
Oencueler, Ayse .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (05) :975-987
[6]  
Abellan-Perpinan J.M., 2009, EC WORKING PAPERS CT, VE2009/06
[7]   Towards a better QALY model [J].
Abellan-Perpinan, Jose-Maria ;
Pinto-Prades, Jose-Luis ;
Mendez-Martinez, Ildefonso ;
Badia-Llach, Xabier .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 15 (07) :665-676
[8]  
[Anonymous], AMBIGUITY
[9]   Developments in time preference and their implications for medical decision making [J].
Attema, A. E. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2012, 63 (10) :1388-1399
[10]   A Direct Method for Measuring Discounting and QALYs More Easily and Reliably [J].
Attema, Arthur E. ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Wakker, Peter P. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (04) :583-593