Using decision aids in community-based primary care: A theory-driven evaluation with ethnically diverse patients
被引:56
作者:
Frosch, Dominick L.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
Frosch, Dominick L.
[1
,2
]
Legare, France
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Laval, Dept Family Med, Quebec City, PQ, CanadaUniv Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
Legare, France
[3
]
Mangione, Carol M.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
Mangione, Carol M.
[1
,2
,4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Laval, Dept Family Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
Objective: To assess the effects of informational brochures and video decision aids about cancer screening on patient intention to engage in shared decision-making and its predictors in a racially diverse sample. Methods: Participants were recruited from 13 community-based primary care practices serving racially and ethnically diverse patients in Predominately economically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Participants completed theory-based measures assessing attitudes, perceived social norms, self-efficacy and intentions for working with their physician to make a cancer screening decision after reviewing a brochure or video decision aid, but before seeing the physician. A post-questionnaire assessed screening decisions and participant knowledge. Results: Participants who reviewed a video decision aid had higher knowledge and were more likely to want to be the primary decision-maker. They reported lower perceived social norms, self-efficacy and intentions to work with their physicians than participants who reviewed a brochure. Participants who decided against cancer screening reported lower intentions to work with their physician in making a decision and were less likely to report having spoken with their physician about screening. Conclusion: Participants who opted against cancer screening after reviewing a brochure or decision aid were less likely to discuss their decision with their physician. The tendency toward autonomous decision-making was stronger among participants who reviewed a video decision aid. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.