Responsible policy analysis in aviation security with an evaluation of PreCheck

被引:10
|
作者
Stewart, Mark G. [1 ]
Mueller, John [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[2] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Cato Inst, Washington, DC USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Terrorism; Risk; Aviation security; Cost-benefit analysis; PreCheck; Decision-making; Acceptable risk; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; AIRPORT SECURITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.06.007
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Officials serving the public are tasked at the most fundamental level to spend funds in a manner that most effectively and efficiently keeps people safe. To do otherwise is irresponsible. In the case of counterterrorism policy-making, it is important, then, to evaluate the degree to which any gains in security afforded by counterterrorism measures are great enough to justify their cost. Risk analysis is an aid to responsible decisionmaking that does exactly that. We deal with four elements central to this approach the cost per saved life, acceptable risk, cost-benefit analysis, and risk communication and we discuss the degree to which risk analysis has been applied within the government to evaluate counterterrorism measures. We summarize our findings when this approach is used to assess the cost-effectiveness of airline and airport security measures, and then conclude by applying it to PreCheck, a measure that seems likely to bring considerable efficiencies to the screening process and great benefits to passengers, airports, and airlines while actually enhancing security somewhat. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 22
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does lift of liquid ban raise or compromise the current level of aviation security in the European Union? Simulation-based quantitative security risk analysis and assessment
    Petzel, Erhard
    Czaja, Roman
    Geiger, Gebhard
    Blobner, Christian
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2015, 18 (07) : 808 - 821
  • [22] Applications of Real Options Analysis in Aviation Security Investments
    Cioaca, Catalin
    Boscoianu, Mircea
    ENGINEERING DECISIONS AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN AEROSPACE, ROBOTICS, BIOMECHANICS, MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, 2013, 436 : 32 - +
  • [23] AVIATION SECURITY AND TERRORISM
    VINCENT, BH
    TERRORISM, 1990, 13 (06): : 397 - 439
  • [24] Difference in risk perception of onboard security threats by aircrew and aviation security experts
    Derrickson, William
    Tripathi, Kartikeya
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 16
  • [25] CATASTROPHE AND RATIONAL POLICY: CASE OF NATIONAL SECURITY
    Mohtadi, Hamid
    Weber, Bryan S.
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2021, 59 (01) : 140 - 161
  • [26] Cyber security challenges in aviation communication, navigation, and surveillance
    Dave, Gaurav
    Choudhary, Gaurav
    Sihag, Vikas
    You, Ilsun
    Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond
    COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2022, 112
  • [27] Food security and nutrition in the Russian Federation - a health policy analysis
    Lunze, Karsten
    Yurasova, Elena
    Idrisov, Bulat
    Gnatienko, Natalia
    Migliorini, Luigi
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2015, 8
  • [28] Aviation and Cyber security threats
    Lehto, Martti
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT (ICCSM-2015), 2015, : 197 - 197
  • [29] Analysis of Risks in Aviation
    Galierikova, A.
    Materna, M.
    Sosedova, J.
    TRANSPORT MEANS 2018, PTS I-III, 2018, : 1427 - 1431
  • [30] Governing dual-use knowledge: From the politics of responsible science to the ethicalization of security
    Rychnovska, Dagmar
    SECURITY DIALOGUE, 2016, 47 (04) : 310 - 328