Factors affect companies' safety performance in Jordan using structural equation modeling

被引:54
作者
Al-Refaie, Abbas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Dept Ind Engn, Amman 11942, Jordan
关键词
Safety behavior; Safety awareness; Safety self-efficacy; Safety performance; ORGANIZATIONAL-FACTORS; WORKPLACE SAFETY; CLIMATE; BEHAVIOR; ACCIDENTS; CULTURE; PERCEPTIONS; ENVIRONMENT; LEADERSHIP; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2013.02.010
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This research examines effects of organizational, safety management, and work group level factors on safety self-efficacy, safety awareness, and safety behavior in Jordanian companies. A total of 324 surveys are collected. Structural equation modeling is then used for data analysis. Results reveal that management commitment, interrelationships harmony, continual improvement and employee empowerment significantly affect safety performance. However, blame culture obstacles spreading safety behavior through safety reporting system or reward system. For large-sized companies, top management, interrelationships, continual improvement, blameless culture, and employee empowerment significantly affect safety awareness and safety behavior. Still, top management should implement effective safety activities and management practices to enhance safety self-efficacy and safety behavior, respectively. For medium-sized companies, it is concluded that top management, as well as interrelationships, continual improvement, and empowered employees do not enhance a safety behavior. Thus, continual improvement and blameless culture should be well-established in safety management system to significantly affect safety behavior. In conclusions, the results of this research provide a valuable feedback to decision makers about the effectiveness of safety performance in Jordanian companies. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 178
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Al-Refaie Abbas, 2011, International Journal of Artificial Life Research, V2, P43, DOI 10.4018/jalr.2011100105
[2]  
Al-Refaie Abbas, 2011, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, V8, P398, DOI 10.1504/IJPQM.2011.043007
[3]  
Al-Refaie A, 2012, JORDAN J MECH IND EN, V6, P45
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT J PRODUCTIVITY Q
[5]   Risk perception and safety behaviour: A study in an occupational environment [J].
Arezes, P. M. ;
Miguel, A. S. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (06) :900-907
[6]  
Boer H., 2000, CI changes from suggestion box to organisational learning: Continuous improvement in Europe and Australia
[7]  
Byrne B.M., 2001, Multivariate applications book series.Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications
[8]   Employee empowerment, innovative behavior and job productivity of public health nurses: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey [J].
Chang, Li-Chun ;
Liu, Chieh-Hsing .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2008, 45 (10) :1442-1448
[9]   Safety climate in an automobile manufacturing plant - The effects of work environment, job communication and safety attitudes on accidents and unsafe behaviour [J].
Clarke, Sharon .
PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2006, 35 (04) :413-430
[10]   Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship [J].
Cooper, MD ;
Phillips, RA .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2004, 35 (05) :497-512