The Impact of Clinical Stage on Prostate Cancer Survival Following Radical Prostatectomy

被引:40
|
作者
Tollefson, Matthew K. [1 ]
Karnes, R. Jeffrey [1 ]
Rangel, Laureano J. [2 ]
Bergstralh, Eric J. [2 ]
Boorjian, Stephen A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Grad Sch Med, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; risk factors; disease progression; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; RADIATION-THERAPY; RISK; ANTIGEN; MORTALITY; MEN; PROGRESSION; MIGRATION; FAILURE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.065
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Clinical stage has been incorporated into multiple risk stratification models for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. However, the independent prognostic value of this variable remains open to debate. In this study we evaluated the association of clinical stage with death from prostate cancer in men who underwent radical prostatectomy and assessed for changes in its prognostic value over time. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of 14,842 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between 1970 and 2008 without having received preoperative hormone or radiation therapy. Postoperative disease recurrence was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the association of clinical stage with outcome. Results: A total of 5,725 (38.6%) men were classified as having cT1 tumors, 8,160 (55.0%) cT2 tumors and 957 (6.4%) cT3 disease. On univariate analysis clinical stage was significantly associated with postoperative biochemical recurrence, systemic progression and death from prostate cancer (p <0.001 for each). Moreover on multivariate analysis clinical stage was significantly associated with death from cancer for patients treated before (1.45, p = 0.006) and those treated during (1.96, p <0.001) the prostate specific antigen era. Furthermore, the incorporation of clinical stage into contemporary risk stratification improved the prediction of cancer specific survival (c statistic 0.782 without and 0.802 with clinical stage). Conclusions: Clinical stage is significantly associated with systemic progression and death from prostate cancer. Inclusion of this variable in multivariate prediction models improves the prediction of systemic progression and cancer specific survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1707 / 1712
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of positive surgical margin on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer
    Ceylan, Cavit
    Tonyali, Senol
    Keles, Ibrahim
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 32 (10) : 514 - 517
  • [2] Clinical Usefulness of Prostate and Tumor Volume Related Parameters following Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Ito, Yujiro
    Udo, Kazuma
    Vertosick, Emily A.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Al-Ahmadie, Hikmat A.
    Chen, Ying-Bei
    Gopalan, Anuradha
    Sirintrapun, S. Joseph
    Tickoo, Satish K.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Fine, Samson W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (03) : 535 - 540
  • [3] Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy: Impact on Metastasis and Survival
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Crispen, Paul L.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Bergstralh, Eric J.
    Blute, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06) : 2708 - 2714
  • [4] Prediction of survival outcomes following postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Leufgens, Friederike
    Berneking, Vanessa
    Voegeli, Thomas-Alexander
    Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth
    Eble, Michael J.
    Pinkawa, Michael
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2020, 59 (02) : 157 - 163
  • [5] Impact of Lymphovascular Invasion on Overall Survival in Patients With Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy: Stage-per-Stage Analysis
    Jamil, Marcus
    Rakic, Nikola
    Sood, Akshay
    Keeley, Jacob
    Modonutti, Daniele
    Novara, Giacomo
    Jeong, Wooju
    Menon, Mani
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Abdollah, Firas
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2021, 19 (05) : E319 - E325
  • [6] Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: Impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Peck, Hugh J.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (04) : 1277 - 1280
  • [7] Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: A multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy
    Kupelian, PA
    Katcher, J
    Levin, HS
    Klein, EA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (05): : 1043 - 1052
  • [8] Clinical Outcomes of Postoperative Radiotherapy Following Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 18-01) of a Korean Population
    Lee, Sung Uk
    Cho, Kwan Ho
    Park, Won
    Cho, Won Kyung
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    Wee, Chan Woo
    Kim, Young Seok
    Kim, Jin Ho
    Nam, Taek-Keun
    Cho, Jaeho
    Jeong, Song Mi
    Kim, Youngkyong
    Shim, Su Jung
    Choi, Youngmin
    Kim, Jun-Sang
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 52 (01): : 167 - 180
  • [9] Salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: survival analysis
    Galla, Andrea
    Maggio, Angelo
    Delmastro, Elena
    Garibaldi, Elisabetta
    Gabriele, Pietro
    Bresciani, Sara
    Di Dia, Amalia
    Stasi, Michele
    Gabriele, Domenico
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (03) : 240 - 248
  • [10] Clinical-Prostate cancer The impact of very high initial PSA on oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Tilki, Derya
    Mandel, Philipp
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Heinze, Alexander
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Knipper, Sophie
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (05) : 379 - 385