Atenolol and eprosartan: Differential effects on central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity

被引:132
作者
Dhakam, Z
McEniery, CM
Yasmin
Cockcroft, JR [1 ]
Brown, MJ
Wilkinson, IB
机构
[1] Univ Wales Coll Med, Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Cardiff CF4 4XN, S Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Clin Pharmacol Unit, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
关键词
hypertension; beta-blockers; angiotensin receptor antagonist; pulse wave velocity; augmentation index;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.08.007
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: Recent data suggest that atenolol may be inferior to other antihypertensive drugs in reducing cardiovascular risk in older individuals with hypertension, despite lowering peripheral blood pressure (BP). We hypothesized that that atenolol fails to reduce central BP as much as other agents. The aim of the present study was to compare the hemodynamic effects of atenolol and eprosartan in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study. Methods: After a 2-week placebo run-in, 21 subjects with never-treated hypertension underwent 6 weeks of therapy with atenolol (50 mg) and eprosartan (600 mg). Central BP and augmentation index were assessed using pulse wave analysis, and aortic pulse wave velocity was measured, at baseline and at the end of each treatment. Results: Both drugs reduced peripheral BP to the same degree. However, there was a significantly greater reduction in central systolic BP with eprosartan (means +/- SEM: 16 +/- 3 v 11 +/- 2 mm Hg; P =.03). Despite identical reductions in mean pressure, atenolol reduced aortic pulse wave velocity more than eprosartan (0.8 +/- 0.1 v 0.5 +/- 0.1 m/sec; P =.005). Conversely, augmentation index and N-terminal pro-brain natiuretic peptide levels were reduced significantly after eprosartan (6% +/- 2% and 11 +/- 5 pg/mL, respectively) but were increased after atenolol (7% +/- 2% and 67 +/- 24 pg/mL, respectively). Conclusions: These data indicate that despite similar effects on peripheral BP and a greater effect on aortic stiffness, atenolol had less impact on central systolic BP than eprosartan because it failed to reduce wave reflection. This provides one potential explanation for the failure of atenolol to improve outcome in older patients with essential hypertension.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 219
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] SYMPATHETIC ACTIVATION DECREASES MEDIUM-SIZED ARTERIAL COMPLIANCE IN HUMANS
    BOUTOUYRIE, P
    LACOLLEY, P
    GIRERD, X
    BECK, L
    SAFAR, M
    LAURENT, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 267 (04): : H1368 - H1376
  • [2] Association between local pulse pressure, mean blood pressure, and large-artery remodeling
    Boutouyrie, P
    Bussy, C
    Lacolley, P
    Girerd, X
    Laloux, B
    Laurent, S
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (13) : 1387 - 1393
  • [3] Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of primary coronary events in hypertensive patients - A longitudinal study
    Boutouyrie, P
    Tropeano, AI
    Asmar, R
    Gautier, I
    Benetos, A
    Lacolley, P
    Laurent, S
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2002, 39 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [4] Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice?
    Carlberg, B
    Samuelsson, O
    Lindholm, LJ
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 364 (9446) : 1684 - 1689
  • [5] Cockcroft JR, 2002, LANCET, V359, P2202, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09075-X
  • [6] Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE):: a randomised trial against atenolol
    Dahlöf, B
    Devereux, RB
    Kjeldsen, SE
    Julius, S
    Beevers, G
    de Faire, U
    Fyhrquist, F
    Ibsen, H
    Kristiansson, K
    Lederballe-Pedersen, O
    Lindholm, LH
    Nieminen, MS
    Omvik, P
    Oparil, S
    Wedel, H
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9311) : 995 - 1003
  • [7] The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes
    de Lemos, JA
    Morrow, DA
    Bentley, JH
    Omland, T
    Sabatine, MS
    McCabe, CH
    Hall, C
    Cannon, CP
    Braunwald, E
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (14) : 1014 - 1021
  • [8] Deary AJ, 2002, CLIN SCI, V103, P493
  • [9] PULSE WAVE VELOCITY IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND IN PATIENTS WITH VARIOUS DISEASE STATES
    ELIAKIM, M
    SAPOZNIKOV, D
    WEINMAN, J
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1971, 82 (04) : 448 - +
  • [10] Furberg CD, 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V288, P2981