The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes

被引:318
|
作者
Ernstson, Henrik [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, African Ctr Cities, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Environmental justice; Urban political ecology; Social-ecological network analysis (SENA); Actor-Network Theory (ANT); Resilience; POLITICAL ECOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; VEGETATION; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A framework is constructed for how to relate ecosystem services to environmental justice. The benefits humans and society can derive from biophysical processes cannot be viewed as objectively existing "out there", but as entangled in social and political processes. This is unpacked through the analytical moments of generation, distribution and articulation of ecosystem services. Social practice moderates the generation of benefits from biophysical processes (through urban development patterns and day-to-day management of urban ecosystems), but also who in society that benefits from them, i.e. the distribution of ecosystem services (viewed here as the temporal and spatial scales at which it is possible for humans to benefit from biophysical processes). Moreover, for biophysical processes to attain value in decision-making, a social practice of value articulation is needed. The framework then moves between two levels of analysis. At the city-wide level, an ecological network translates how urban 'green' areas, viewed as nodes, are interconnected by ecological flows (water, species movement, etc.) where nodes have different protective and management capacities. The network captures spatial complexity-what happens in one location, can have effects elsewhere. At the local level, urban struggles over land-use are studied to trace how actors utilize artifacts and social arenas to articulate how certain biophysical processes are of value. Competing networks of value articulation strive to influence land-use, and multiple local studies bring understanding of how power operates locally, informing city-wide analyses. Empirical studies from Stockholm, Cape Town and other cities inform the framework. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 17
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social ecological mapping of urban landscapes: Challenges and perspectives on ecosystem services in Mashhad, Iran
    Ramyar, Reza
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 92
  • [2] An environmental justice perspective on ecosystem services
    Loos, Jacqueline
    Benra, Felipe
    Berbes-Blazquez, Marta
    Bremer, Leah L.
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Egoh, Benis
    Felipe-Lucia, Maria
    Geneletti, Davide
    Keeler, Bonnie
    Locatelli, Bruno
    Loft, Lasse
    Schroeter, Barbara
    Schroeter, Matthias
    Winkler, Klara J.
    AMBIO, 2023, 52 (03) : 477 - 488
  • [3] Mapping and characterizing ecosystem services of social–ecological production landscapes: case study of Noto, Japan
    Shizuka Hashimoto
    Shogo Nakamura
    Osamu Saito
    Ryo Kohsaka
    Chiho Kamiyama
    Mitsuyuki Tomiyoshi
    Tomoya Kishioka
    Sustainability Science, 2015, 10 : 257 - 273
  • [4] Studying the complexity of change: toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations
    Moore, Michele-Lee
    Tjornbo, Ola
    Enfors, Elin
    Knapp, Corrie
    Hodbod, Jennifer
    Baggio, Jacopo A.
    Norstrom, Albert
    Olsson, Per
    Biggs, Duan
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (04):
  • [5] A social-ecological-technological systems framework for urban ecosystem services
    McPhearson, Timon
    Cook, Elizabeth M.
    Berbes-Blazquez, Marta
    Cheng, Chingwen
    Grimm, Nancy B.
    Anderson, Erik
    Barbosa, Olga
    Chandler, David G.
    Chang, Heeju
    V. Chester, Mikhail
    Childers, Daniel L.
    Elser, Stephen R.
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Grabowski, Zbigniew
    Groffman, Peter
    Hale, Rebecca L.
    Iwaniec, David M.
    Kabisch, Nadja
    Kennedy, Christopher
    Markolf, Samuel A.
    Matsler, A. Marissa
    McPhillips, Lauren E.
    Miller, Thaddeus R.
    Munoz-Erickson, Tischa A.
    Rosi, Emma
    Troxler, Tiffany G.
    ONE EARTH, 2022, 5 (05): : 505 - 518
  • [6] Mapping and characterizing ecosystem services of social-ecological production landscapes: case study of Noto, Japan
    Hashimoto, Shizuka
    Nakamura, Shogo
    Saito, Osamu
    Kohsaka, Ryo
    Kamiyama, Chiho
    Tomiyoshi, Mitsuyuki
    Kishioka, Tomoya
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2015, 10 (02) : 257 - 273
  • [7] The services-oriented architecture: Ecosystem services as a framework for diagnosing change in social ecological systems
    Loring, Philip A.
    Chapin, F. Stuart, III
    Gerlach, S. Craig
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2008, 11 (03) : 478 - 489
  • [8] Spatial complexity and ecosystem services in rural landscapes
    Laterra, Pedro
    Orue, Maria E.
    Booman, Gisel C.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 154 : 56 - 67
  • [9] The Services-Oriented Architecture: Ecosystem Services as a Framework for Diagnosing Change in Social Ecological Systems
    Philip A. Loring
    F. Stuart Chapin
    S. Craig Gerlach
    Ecosystems, 2008, 11 : 478 - 489
  • [10] A Resilience Framework for Chronic Exposures: Water Quality and Ecosystem Services in Coastal Social-Ecological Systems
    Merrill, Nathaniel H.
    Mulvaney, Kate K.
    Martin, David M.
    Chintala, Marnita M.
    Berry, Walter
    Gleason, Timothy R.
    Balogh, Stephen
    Humphries, Austin T.
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 46 (04) : 242 - 258