Does emission trading lead to carbon leakage in China? Direction and channel identifications

被引:67
|
作者
Zhou, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Cheng [2 ]
Wang, Qunwei [1 ]
Zhou, Dequn [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
来源
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS | 2020年 / 132卷 / 132期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Emission trading; Carbon leakage direction; Carbon leakage channel; Shift-share method; Difference-in-difference-in-differences model; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; EU-ETS; MARKET-EFFICIENCY; CLIMATE POLICY; IMPACT; DECOMPOSITION; INDUSTRY; COMPETITIVENESS; POLLUTION; TRANSFERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110090
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Unilateral emission trading may lead to carbon leakage. The leakage direction and channel are critical to multilateral emission mitigation. Despite the increasing number of investigations into the carbon leakage induced by emission trading, there is a lack of empirical research on the specific leakage channels related to the emission trading market. This paper develops a difference-in-difference-in-differences model to identify carbon leakage directions in emission trading pilots in China. The issue of whether market participation and industrial transfer are the specific leakage channels related to emission trading is also examined. Emission trading pilots lead to reverse carbon leakage, which moves from the non-pilot region to the pilot region. Market participation and industrial transfer are confirmed to be the specific leakage channels in emission trading. Of the two channels, market participation is the one that determines the reverse direction.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does carbon emission trading mitigate firm?s default risk? Evidence from China
    Zhang, Qingjun
    Zhang, Sulan
    Chen, Rong
    Li, Jing
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 398
  • [22] Does the emissions trading system in developing countries accelerate carbon leakage through OFDI? Evidence from China
    Yu, Pei
    Cai, Zhengfang
    Sun, Yongping
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 101
  • [23] Emission trading and carbon market performance in Shenzhen, China
    Ren, Cong
    Lo, Alex Y.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 193 : 414 - 425
  • [24] The neoliberal policy experimentation on carbon emission trading in China
    Lo, Alex Y.
    Chen, Kang
    Lee, Anna Ka-yin
    Mai, Lindsay Qianqing
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2020, 38 (01) : 153 - 173
  • [25] A CRITICAL STUDY OF CARBON EMISSION TRADING MARKET IN CHINA
    Wang, Qiushuang
    Zheng, Xiaosong
    6TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT 2010, VOLS I AND II, 2010, : 752 - 759
  • [26] Research on China's carbon emission trading market
    Yin, Yingkai
    Zhou, Lei
    Chen, Yanzhou
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND MATERIALS (IFEESM 2017), 2017, 120 : 1429 - 1433
  • [27] Can China's policy of carbon emission trading promote carbon emission reduction?
    Xuan, Dong
    Ma, Xiaowei
    Shang, Yuping
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 270
  • [28] Do China's pilot emissions trading schemes lead to domestic carbon leakage? Perspective from the firm relocation
    Pan, Xian
    Yu, Lihong
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 132
  • [29] Does China's carbon emission trading policy have an employment double dividend and a Porter effect?
    Yang, Xinyu
    Jiang, Ping
    Pan, Yao
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 142 (142)
  • [30] Research on the impact and intermediary effect of carbon emission trading policy on carbon emission efficiency in China
    Hou, Jian
    Shi, Chengxi
    Fan, Guoliang
    Xu, Hongxia
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (04)