Numerical Study on Acoustic Oscillations of 2D and 3D Flue Organ Pipe Like Instruments with Compressible LES

被引:20
|
作者
Miyamoto, Masataka [1 ]
Ito, Yasunori [1 ]
Iwasaki, Takuya [1 ]
Akamura, Takahiro [1 ]
Takahashi, Kin'ya [1 ]
Takami, Toshiya [2 ]
Kobayashi, Taizo [2 ]
Nishida, Akira [2 ]
Aoyagi, Mutsumi [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Inst Technol, Phys Labs, Iizuka, Fukuoka 8208502, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Res Inst Informat Technol, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128581, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; SOUND PRODUCTION; WAVE-PROPAGATION; RECORDERLIKE INSTRUMENTS; MOUTH GEOMETRY; JET VELOCITY; MECHANISM; MODEL; INSTABILITY; VIBRATIONS;
D O I
10.3813/AAA.918599
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Acoustic oscillations of flue instruments are investigated numerically using compressible Large Eddy Simulation (LES). Investigating 2D and 3D models of flue instruments, we reproduce acoustic oscillations excited in the resonators as well as an important characteristic feature of flue instruments - the relation between the acoustic frequency and the jet velocity described by the semi-empirical theory developed by Cremer & Ising, Coltman and Fletcher et al. based on experimental results. Both 2D and 3D models exhibit almost the same oscillation frequency for a given jet velocity, but the acoustic oscillation as well as the jet motion is more stable in the 3D model than in the 2D model, due to less stability in 3D fluid of the rolled up eddies created by the collision of the jet with the edge, which largely disturb the jet motion and acoustic field in the 2D model. We also investigate the ratio of the amplitude of the acoustic flow through the mouth opening to the jet velocity, comparing with the experimental results and semi-empirical theory given by Hirschberg et al..
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 171
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study on the transmission characteristics and band structure of 2D and 3D plasma photonic crystals
    Liang, Yichao
    Liang, Zhuqing
    Liu, Zhen
    Jun, Peng
    Qiu, Dianqing
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2023, 31 (02) : 776 - 791
  • [22] Thermodynamics at microscales: 3D → 2D, 1D and 0D
    Dong, Kun
    Huo, Feng
    Zhang, Suojiang
    GREEN ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 5 (03) : 251 - 258
  • [23] Generation of Patterned Cocultures in 2D and 3D: State of the Art
    Joshi, Akshay
    Singh, Neetu
    ACS OMEGA, 2023, 8 (38): : 34249 - 34261
  • [24] Guided Impact Mitigation in 2D and 3D Granular Crystals
    Burgoyne, Hayden A.
    Newman, John A.
    Jackson, Wade C.
    Daraio, Chiara
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 HYPERVELOCITY IMPACT SYMPOSIUM (HVIS 2015), 2015, 103 : 52 - 59
  • [25] Comparative observer effects in 2D and 3D localization tasks
    Abbey, Craig K.
    Lago, Miguel A.
    Eckstein, Miguel P.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2021, 8 (04)
  • [26] Learning 3D Deformation of Animals from 2D Images
    Kanazawa, Angjoo
    Kovalsky, Shahar
    Basri, Ronen
    Jacobs, David
    COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM, 2016, 35 (02) : 365 - 374
  • [27] 3D surface configuration modulates 2D symmetry detection
    Chen, Chien-Chung
    Sio, Lok-Teng
    VISION RESEARCH, 2015, 107 : 86 - 93
  • [28] Experimental Study of Crushed Granular Materials by the Notion of Fractal Dimension in 2D and 3D
    Bouzeboudja, Houria
    Melbouci, Bachir
    Bouzeboudja, Aldjia
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 40 (04) : 2009 - 2031
  • [29] Depinning of 2d and 3d Droplets Blocked by a Hydrophobic Defect
    Beltrame, P.
    Haenggi, P.
    Knobloch, E.
    Thiele, U.
    PROGRESS IN INDUSTRIAL MATHEMATICS AT ECMI 2008, 2010, 15 : 623 - +
  • [30] 2D vs 3D NAND Technology: Reliability Benchmark
    Puzzilli, Giuseppina
    Righetti, Niccolo
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INTEGRATED RELIABILITY WORKSHOP (IIRW), 2017, : 51 - 56