A Comparison of Methods for Determining Dimensionality in Rasch Measurement

被引:93
|
作者
Smith, Richard M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rehabil Fdn Inc, Marianjoy Hosp & Clin, Wheaton, IL 60189 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10705519609540027
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This study compares the Rasch item fit approach for detecting multidimensionality in response data with principal component analysis without rotation using simulated data. The data in this study were simulated to represent varying degrees of multidimensionality and varying proportions of items representing each dimension. Because the requirement of unidimensionality is necessary to preserve the desirable measurement properties of Rasch models, useful ways of testing this requirement must be developed. The results of the analyses indicate that both the principal component approach and the Rasch item fit approach work in a variety of multidimensional data structures. However, each technique is unable to detect multidimensionality in certain combinations of the level of correlation between the two variables and the proportion of items loading on the two factors. In cases where the intention is to create a unidimensional structure, one would expect few items to load on the second factor and the correlation between the factors to be high. The Rasch item fit approach detects dimensionality more accurately in these situations.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 40
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Classification and Dimensionality Reduction Methods Used in fMRI Decoding
    Alamdari, Nasim T.
    Fatemizadeh, Emad
    2013 8TH IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON MACHINE VISION & IMAGE PROCESSING (MVIP 2013), 2013, : 175 - 179
  • [42] A Comparison of Dimensionality Reduction Methods Using Topology Preservation Indexes
    de Medeiros, Claudio J. F.
    Ferreira Costa, Jose Alfredo
    Silva, Leandro A.
    INTELLIGENT DATA ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATED LEARNING - IDEAL 2011, 2011, 6936 : 437 - 445
  • [43] Empirical comparison between autoencoders and traditional dimensionality reduction methods
    Fournier, Quentin
    Aloise, Daniel
    2019 IEEE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING (AIKE), 2019, : 211 - 214
  • [44] Dimensionality Reduction in Boolean Data: Comparison of Four BMF Methods
    Bartl, Eduard
    Belohlavek, Radim
    Osicka, Petr
    Rezankova, Hana
    CLUSTERING HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DATA, CHDD 2012, 2015, 7627 : 118 - 133
  • [45] Comparison between Two Dimensionality Reduction Methods in Time Series
    Zhang, Hanwen
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE ESTADISTICA, 2009, 32 (02): : 189 - 212
  • [46] COMPARISON OF METHODS OF SWELLING MEASUREMENT
    TANIGUCHI, S
    OHMI, M
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE OF JAPAN, 1980, 20 (08) : 509 - 517
  • [47] Comparison of alternative measurement methods
    Kuttatharmmakul, S
    Massart, DL
    Smeyers-Verbeke, J
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1999, 391 (02) : 203 - 225
  • [48] COMPARISON OF THICKNESS MEASUREMENT METHODS
    CROMBIE, P
    APPITA, 1972, 26 (03): : 203 - 206
  • [49] A Comparison of Gait Measurement Methods
    Jones, J. Adam
    Thai Phan
    2019 IEEE SOUTHEASTCON, 2019,
  • [50] COMPARISON OF PREFERENCE MEASUREMENT METHODS
    ROTHAUSER, EH
    URBANEK, GE
    PACHL, WP
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1971, 49 (04): : 1297 - +