A Comparison of Methods for Determining Dimensionality in Rasch Measurement

被引:93
|
作者
Smith, Richard M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rehabil Fdn Inc, Marianjoy Hosp & Clin, Wheaton, IL 60189 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10705519609540027
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This study compares the Rasch item fit approach for detecting multidimensionality in response data with principal component analysis without rotation using simulated data. The data in this study were simulated to represent varying degrees of multidimensionality and varying proportions of items representing each dimension. Because the requirement of unidimensionality is necessary to preserve the desirable measurement properties of Rasch models, useful ways of testing this requirement must be developed. The results of the analyses indicate that both the principal component approach and the Rasch item fit approach work in a variety of multidimensional data structures. However, each technique is unable to detect multidimensionality in certain combinations of the level of correlation between the two variables and the proportion of items loading on the two factors. In cases where the intention is to create a unidimensional structure, one would expect few items to load on the second factor and the correlation between the factors to be high. The Rasch item fit approach detects dimensionality more accurately in these situations.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 40
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING SODIUM IN FERTILIZERS
    COROMINAS, LF
    BOY, VM
    ROJAS, P
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS, 1981, 64 (03): : 704 - 708
  • [32] Comparison of different methods for determining diabetes
    Bozkurt, Mehmet Recep
    Yurtay, Nilufer
    Yilmaz, Ziynet
    Sertkaya, Cengiz
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2014, 22 (04) : 1044 - 1055
  • [33] How can Rasch measurement methods inform a measurement paradigm shift in mental health care?
    Barbic, Skye P.
    Kidd, Sean A.
    MacEwan, William G.
    Honer, William G.
    McKenzie, Kwame
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 : 76 - 76
  • [34] The Rasch wars: The emergence of Rasch measurement in language testing
    McNamara, Tim
    Knoch, Ute
    LANGUAGE TESTING, 2012, 29 (04) : 555 - 576
  • [35] Comparison of Rasch Methods for Responsiveness Analysis of the Adult Strabismus 20 Questionnaire
    Leske, David A.
    Hatt, Sarah R.
    Liebermann, Laura
    Holmes, Jonathan M.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [36] COMPARISON OF K40 MEASUREMENT WITH OTHER METHODS FOR DETERMINING LEAN MUSCLE MASS IN SHEEP
    BREIDENSTIEN, BC
    LOHMAN, TG
    HATFIELD, EE
    SMITH, GS
    NORTON, HW
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1965, 24 (03) : 860 - +
  • [37] THORNDIKE, THURSTONE, AND RASCH - A COMPARISON OF THEIR METHODS OF SCALING PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL TESTS
    ENGELHARD, G
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1984, 8 (01) : 21 - 38
  • [38] Determining Strength: A Case for Multiple Methods of Measurement
    Buckner, Samuel L.
    Jessee, Matthew B.
    Mattocks, Kevin T.
    Mouser, J. Grant
    Counts, Brittany R.
    Dankel, Scott J.
    Loenneke, Jeremy P.
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 47 (02) : 193 - 195
  • [39] Measurement methods for determining the roughness of concrete surfaces
    Wieneke, K.
    Herbrand, M.
    Vogler, N.
    Schwermann, R.
    Blankenbach, J.
    BAUINGENIEUR, 2018, 93 : 365 - 373
  • [40] Determining Strength: A Case for Multiple Methods of Measurement
    Samuel L. Buckner
    Matthew B. Jessee
    Kevin T. Mattocks
    J. Grant Mouser
    Brittany R. Counts
    Scott J. Dankel
    Jeremy P. Loenneke
    Sports Medicine, 2017, 47 : 193 - 195