A Comparison of Methods for Determining Dimensionality in Rasch Measurement

被引:93
|
作者
Smith, Richard M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rehabil Fdn Inc, Marianjoy Hosp & Clin, Wheaton, IL 60189 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10705519609540027
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This study compares the Rasch item fit approach for detecting multidimensionality in response data with principal component analysis without rotation using simulated data. The data in this study were simulated to represent varying degrees of multidimensionality and varying proportions of items representing each dimension. Because the requirement of unidimensionality is necessary to preserve the desirable measurement properties of Rasch models, useful ways of testing this requirement must be developed. The results of the analyses indicate that both the principal component approach and the Rasch item fit approach work in a variety of multidimensional data structures. However, each technique is unable to detect multidimensionality in certain combinations of the level of correlation between the two variables and the proportion of items loading on the two factors. In cases where the intention is to create a unidimensional structure, one would expect few items to load on the second factor and the correlation between the factors to be high. The Rasch item fit approach detects dimensionality more accurately in these situations.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 40
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of dimensionality reduction methods for TCM symptom information
    Fu, Haoyang
    Li, Jingbo
    Liang, Likeng
    PROCEEDINGS 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM), 2018, : 1861 - 1865
  • [22] A Comparison of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Large Biological Data
    Babjac, Ashley
    Royalty, Taylor
    Steen, Andrew D.
    Emrich, Scott J.
    13TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS, COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, BCB 2022, 2022,
  • [23] Introduction to Rasch measurement
    von Davier, Matthias
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2006, 30 (05) : 443 - 446
  • [24] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING BIURET IN UREA
    COROMINAS, LF
    BOY, VM
    GUIJOSA, M
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS, 1979, 62 (01): : 153 - 159
  • [25] A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING PROTEOLYTIC ACTIVITY
    BOWLBY, C
    TUCKER, H
    MILLER, BS
    JOHNSON, JA
    CEREAL CHEMISTRY, 1953, 30 (06) : 480 - 491
  • [26] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING MYROSINASE ACTIVITY
    PALMIERI, S
    IORI, R
    LEONI, O
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1987, 35 (04) : 617 - 621
  • [27] A comparison of methods for determining the size of the erythrocyte
    Haden, RL
    JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE, 1931, 16 : 976 - 984
  • [28] Determining radium in water: Comparison of methods
    Chalupnik, S
    Lebecka, J
    Mielnikow, A
    Michalik, B
    LIQUID SCINTILLATION SPECTROMETRY 1994, 1996, : 103 - 109
  • [29] Comparison of methods of determining the resilience of rubbers
    Khromov, M.K.
    Niazashvili, G.A.
    Kauchuk i Rezina, 2001, (05): : 19 - 23
  • [30] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING STRATUM BOUNDARIES
    COCHRAN, WG
    BULLETIN OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL INSTITUTE, 1961, 38 (02): : 345 - 358