Notes on life-cycle assessments of vegetable oils

被引:0
|
作者
Zemanek, G [1 ]
Reinhardt, GA [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Energie Umweltforschung, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
来源
FETT-LIPID | 1999年 / 101卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Renewable resources like vegetable oils constitute a central element in the discussion of the implementation of a sustainable development. Vegetable oils play an increasingly important part in the production of biodegradable materials. But considering the ecological effects of their production and use vegetable oils show advantages and disadvantages. Life-cycle assessments (LCAs) allow a detailed evaluation of their ecological performance. Carrying out LCAs the determination of the methodological proceedings is required. It is one of the objectives of the present study to ascertain if, or how strong, these methodological determinations can influence the results of LCAs. The LCA of refined rapeseed oil serves as an example. The following issues are of special interest here: the selection of a reference system, the balancing principles for coproducts, and the balancing principles for emissions under consideration of their site-specific impacts. Furthermore, the results for rapeseed oil and soybean oil are compared in order to find out if LCAs for different vegetable oils show similar results (which would allow the undiscriminate transfer of the LCA results from one oil to another). Finally, the LCA results of rapeseed oil, that have been obtained for the currently quantifiable parameters, are presented. As the study shows, the methodological approach can influence the LCA results significantly. Therefore, it is necessary to define and document the applied methodological approach carefully in order to base the LCA on verifiable facts and to obtain realistic results. The undiscriminate transfer of LCA results from one vegetable oil to another is not allowed because incorrect results are possible.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 327
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Integrating groundwater stress in life-cycle assessments - An evaluation of water abstraction
    Gejl, R. N.
    Bjerg, P. L.
    Henriksen, H. J.
    Hauschild, M. Z.
    Rasmussen, J.
    Rygaard, M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 222 : 112 - 121
  • [22] Urban green infrastructure: perspectives on life-cycle thinking for holistic assessments
    Romanovska, Linda
    SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE 2019 TOKYO (SBE19TOKYO) - BUILT ENVIRONMENT IN AN ERA OF CLIMATE CHANGE: HOW CAN CITIES AND BUILDINGS ADAPT?, 2019, 294
  • [23] Evaluation of methods used for life-cycle assessments in Discrete Event Simulation
    Andersson, Jon
    Skoogh, Anders
    Johansson, Bjorn
    2012 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2012,
  • [24] Life-cycle design of residential buildings: appearance and reality of ecological assessments
    Michlmair, M.
    Maydl, P.
    LIFE-CYCLE CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2008, : 397 - 402
  • [25] Comparaison of the various electricity generation systems on the basis of life-cycle assessments
    Gagnon, Luc
    Bélanger, Camille
    Revue de l'Energie, 2003, (546): : 285 - 294
  • [26] LIFE-CYCLE
    TOMSON, DPC
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 295 (6613): : 1644 - 1645
  • [27] NEW TOOLS THAT CAN HELP ARCHITECTS MAKE LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS OF PRODUCTS
    CHUSID, M
    PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE, 1991, 72 (12): : 49 - 49
  • [28] Mixed method review for integrating building information modeling and life-cycle assessments
    Seyis, Senem
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 173
  • [29] Integrating emerging metal risk assessment technologies into life-cycle impact assessments
    Adams, WJ
    LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF METALS: ISSUES AND RESEARCH DIRECTIONS, 2003, : 171 - 177
  • [30] Impacts of the Allocation Assumption in Life-Cycle Assessments of Wood-Based Panels
    Taylor, Adam M.
    Bergman, Richard D.
    Puettmann, Maureen E.
    Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2017, 67 (5-6) : 390 - 396