Is Predicting Software Security Bugs using Deep Learning Better than the Traditional Machine Learning Algorithms?

被引:11
作者
Clemente, Caesar Jude [1 ]
Jaafar, Fehmi [2 ]
Malik, Yasir [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ Edmonton, Dept Informat Syst, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Concordia Univ Edmonton, Dept Informat Syst, Comp Res Inst Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE QUALITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY (QRS 2018) | 2018年
关键词
Software Insecurity; Software Metrics; Bug Propensity Correlational Analysis; Predictive Models; Deep Learning; Feedforward Artificial Network;
D O I
10.1109/QRS.2018.00023
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Software insecurity is being identified as one of the leading causes of security breaches. In this paper, we revisited one of the strategies in solving software insecurity, which is the use of software quality metrics. We utilized a multilayer deep feedforward network in examining whether there is a combination of metrics that can predict the appearance of security-related bugs. We also applied the traditional machine learning algorithms such as decision tree, random forest, naive bayes, and support vector machines and compared the results with that of the Deep Learning technique. The results have successfully demonstrated that it was possible to develop an effective predictive model to forecast software insecurity based on the software metrics and using Deep Learning. All the models generated have shown an accuracy of more than sixty percent with Deep Learning leading the list. This finding proved that utilizing Deep Learning methods and a combination of software metrics can be tapped to create a better forecasting model thereby aiding software developers in predicting security bugs.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Measuring, analyzing and predicting security vulnerabilities in software systems [J].
Alhazmi, O. H. ;
Malaiya, Y. K. ;
Ray, I. .
COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2007, 26 (03) :219-228
[2]   Software Metrics and Security Vulnerabilities: Dataset and Exploratory Study [J].
Alves, Henrique ;
Fonseca, Baldoino ;
Antunes, Nuno .
2016 12TH EUROPEAN DEPENDABLE COMPUTING CONFERENCE (EDCC 2016), 2016, :37-44
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, MATLAB - mathworks - MATLAB & simulink, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, METRICS SCITOOLS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, INTRO HACKING MOZILL
[6]  
Bekkar M., 2013, J. Inf. Eng. Appl., V3, P27
[7]  
Bengio Y., 2017, Deep learning, V1
[8]  
Camilo F., 2015, DO BUGS FORESHADOW V
[9]  
Catal C., 2015, CAN WE PREDICT SOFTW, P19
[10]  
Chess B., 2006, WORK SOFTW SEC ASS T, P7