The 2011 Program Evaluation Standards: a framework for quality in medical education programme evaluations

被引:8
|
作者
Ruhe, Valerie [1 ]
Boudreau, J. Donald [2 ]
机构
[1] Educ Program Evaluat, Sechelt, BC V0N 3A3, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Off Physicianship Curriculum Dev, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
medical education; programme evaluation; quality; standards;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01879.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale, aims and objectivesBased on input from 400 stakeholders over 6years, the 2011 Program Evaluation Standards represents an in-depth analysis of values, meaning and measurement and their relationships in programme evaluation. Evaluation quality is achieved by balancing five attributes: utility, feasibility, propriety, accuracy and evaluation accountability. These attributes are used to organize 30 standards, 200 strategies and 197 hazards. MethodIn response to a call from the authors of the standards, we have used them to guide our meta-evaluation of McGill's undergraduate physicianship programme. ResultsOur findings show how the standards illuminate the tensions, dilemmas and hazards inherent in all stages of programme evaluation studies and offer helpful strategies for designing and conducting high-quality evaluation studies. ConclusionsBased on our experience, the third edition needs to be used as a reference document in all stages of evaluations of medical education programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:925 / 932
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploration and evaluation of reporting quality of randomised controlled trials on blended learning in medical education
    Zhang, Xiaoli
    Zhang, Guanran
    Chen, Yanru
    Wang, Fuwu
    Guo, Yuji
    Li, Xiaorui
    Zhang, Jianming
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 85 (06)
  • [32] Evaluation of the Program in Medical Education for the Urban Underserved (PRIME-US) at the UC Berkeley-UCSF Joint Medical Program (JMP): The First 4 Years
    Sokal-Gutierrez, Karen
    Ivey, Susan L.
    Garcia, Roxanna M.
    Azzam, Amin
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2015, 27 (02) : 189 - 196
  • [33] The WFME global standards for quality improvement of postgraduate medical education: Which standards are also applicable in Germany? Recommendations for physicians with a license for postgraduate training and training agents
    Schwill, Simon
    Kadmon, Martina
    Hahn, Eckhart G.
    Kunisch, Raphael
    Berberat, Pascal O.
    Fehr, Folkert
    Hennel, Eva
    GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 39 (04):
  • [34] Rare Disease Education Outside of the Classroom and Clinic: Evaluation of the RARE Compassion Program for Undergraduate Medical Students
    Morgenthau, Ari
    Margus, Colton
    Mackley, Michael P.
    Miller, Ashley P.
    GENES, 2022, 13 (10)
  • [35] Quality Evaluation of Entrepreneurship Education in Chinese Medical Colleges-From the Perspective of Student Cognition
    Li, Yuhui
    Shen, Wei
    Lv, Yijun
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [36] Impact of a longitudinal faculty development program on the quality of multiple-choice question item writing in medical education
    Owolabi, Lukman Femi
    Adamu, Bappa
    Taura, Magaji Garba
    Isa, Adamu Imam
    Jibo, Abubakar Muhammed
    Abdul-Razek, Reda
    Alharthi, Mufarrah Muhammed
    Alghamdi, Mushabab
    ANNALS OF AFRICAN MEDICINE, 2021, 20 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [37] Evaluation of the star family doctors training program: an observational cohort study of a novel continuing medical education program for general practitioners within a compact medical consortium: a quantitative analysis
    Liang, Ling-Bo
    Li, Xu
    Liu, Xiang-Ping
    Li, Cai-Zheng
    Luo, Dan
    Liu, Feng
    Mao, Ting-Rui
    Su, Qiao-Li
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [38] Implementation and evaluation of a case-based computer-assisted learning program in medical education - a feasibility study
    Gerike, TG
    Baehring, TU
    Hentschel, B
    Fischer, A
    Scherbaum, WA
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK, 1999, 94 (02) : 76 - 81
  • [39] Is the delivery of a quality improvement education programme in obstetrics and gynaecology for final year medical students feasible and still effective in a shortened time frame?
    Kool, Bridget
    Wise, Michelle R.
    Peiris-John, Roshini
    Sadler, Lynn
    Mahony, Faith
    Wells, Susan
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 17
  • [40] Is the delivery of a quality improvement education programme in obstetrics and gynaecology for final year medical students feasible and still effective in a shortened time frame?
    Bridget Kool
    Michelle R. Wise
    Roshini Peiris-John
    Lynn Sadler
    Faith Mahony
    Susan Wells
    BMC Medical Education, 17