The 2011 Program Evaluation Standards: a framework for quality in medical education programme evaluations

被引:8
|
作者
Ruhe, Valerie [1 ]
Boudreau, J. Donald [2 ]
机构
[1] Educ Program Evaluat, Sechelt, BC V0N 3A3, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Off Physicianship Curriculum Dev, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
medical education; programme evaluation; quality; standards;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01879.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale, aims and objectivesBased on input from 400 stakeholders over 6years, the 2011 Program Evaluation Standards represents an in-depth analysis of values, meaning and measurement and their relationships in programme evaluation. Evaluation quality is achieved by balancing five attributes: utility, feasibility, propriety, accuracy and evaluation accountability. These attributes are used to organize 30 standards, 200 strategies and 197 hazards. MethodIn response to a call from the authors of the standards, we have used them to guide our meta-evaluation of McGill's undergraduate physicianship programme. ResultsOur findings show how the standards illuminate the tensions, dilemmas and hazards inherent in all stages of programme evaluation studies and offer helpful strategies for designing and conducting high-quality evaluation studies. ConclusionsBased on our experience, the third edition needs to be used as a reference document in all stages of evaluations of medical education programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:925 / 932
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analyzing softwares in medical education focusing on quality standards
    Muniz Barros, Paulo Ricardo
    Cazella, Silvio Cesar
    Flores, Cecilia Dias
    2015 IEEE 28TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CBMS), 2015, : 292 - 297
  • [2] Evaluation of continuous quality improvement in accreditation for medical education
    Akdemir, Nesibe
    Peterson, Linda N.
    Campbell, Craig M.
    Scheele, Fedde
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (Suppl 1)
  • [3] Evaluation of a medical education program: medical errors in surgery as an example
    Al-Doghether, Mohammed Hassen
    WORLD FAMILY MEDICINE, 2014, 12 (01): : 45 - 53
  • [4] LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY STATE STANDARDS. A CASE OF ALBANIA
    Latifi, Juliana
    PROBLEMS OF EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2012, 42
  • [5] Leveraging evaluation of quality on medical education research with ChatGPT
    Flores-Cohaila, Javier Alejandro
    Garcia-Portocarrero, Peter
    Saldana-Amaya, Deysi A.
    Miranda-Chavez, Brayan
    Copaja-Corzo, Cesar
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2025, 47 (03) : 401 - 403
  • [6] Evaluation of continuous quality improvement in accreditation for medical education
    Nesibe Akdemir
    Linda N. Peterson
    Craig M. Campbell
    Fedde Scheele
    BMC Medical Education, 20
  • [7] Barriers to obtaining reliable results from evaluations of teaching quality in undergraduate medical education
    Zhang, Zemiao
    Wu, Qi
    Zhang, Xinping
    Xiong, Juyang
    Zhang, Lan
    Le, Hong
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [8] Factors related to the role of programme directors in association with quality in postgraduate medical education - a cross-sectional study
    Wijk, Hanna
    Ponzer, Sari
    Jarnbert-Pettersson, Hans
    Kihlstrom, Lars
    Nordquist, Jonas
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [9] Factors related to the role of programme directors in association with quality in postgraduate medical education – a cross-sectional study
    Hanna Wijk
    Sari Ponzer
    Hans Järnbert-Pettersson
    Lars Kihlström
    Jonas Nordquist
    BMC Medical Education, 19
  • [10] QCI - Medical laboratory program journey of quality in public medical laboratories": An experience though program evaluation
    Rana, Bhupendra Kumar
    Behera, Narendra Shekhar
    Nair, Sujeeth B.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 62 (04) : 7 - 11