Characteristics of YouTube™ Videos Related to Mammography

被引:26
作者
Basch, Corey H. [1 ]
Hillyer, Grace Clarke [2 ]
MacDonald, Zerlina L. [1 ]
Reeves, Rachel [1 ]
Basch, Charles E. [3 ]
机构
[1] William Paterson Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Wayne, NJ 07470 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Hlth & Behav Studies, Teachers Coll, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Mammography; Screening; YouTube (TM); Social media;
D O I
10.1007/s13187-014-0769-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
With a monthly total of more than one billion unique visitors, YouTube (TM) is one of the Internet's most visited websites and contributes to the growing amount of health-related information on the Internet. The purpose of this study was to analyze coverage of mammography screening in popular YouTube (TM) videos. A total of 173 videos were included in the analysis. Compared with professionally created videos, consumer-created videos had a significantly greater number of comments (> 9 comments 38.0 % for consumer vs. 11.8 % for professional videos, p = < 0.001). Videos created by professionals more often portrayed general mammography information (97.1 vs. 88.7 %) compared to those created by consumers. The vast majority of videos presented general information (93.6 %) related to mammography, and almost two thirds addressed preparing for the test. Less than 20 % dealt with other types of examinations. Approximately 30 % discussed pain associated with the examination (35.3 %) and addressed issues of anxiety (32.4 %) and fear (29.5 %). Nearly half of the videos presented information about the test results (46.2 %). Over 25 % covered medical or family history. The majority did not pertain to a specific age group. Future research should focus on analyzing the accuracy of the information in the videos.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 703
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009, SCREEN BREAST CANC U
  • [2] Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet
    Ancelle-Park, R.
    Armaroli, P.
    Ascunce, N.
    Bisanti, L.
    Bellisario, C.
    Broeders, M.
    Cogo, C.
    de Koning, H.
    Duffy, S. W.
    Frigerio, A.
    Giordano, L.
    Hofvind, S.
    Jonsson, H.
    Lynge, E.
    Massat, N.
    Miccinesi, G.
    Moss, S.
    Naldoni, C.
    Njor, S.
    Nystrom, L.
    Paap, E.
    Paci, E.
    Patnick, J.
    Ponti, A.
    Puliti, D.
    Segnan, N.
    Von Karsa, L.
    Tornberg, S.
    Zappa, M.
    Zorzi, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2012, 19 : 5 - 13
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, CANC FACTS FIG 2014
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, Breast Cancer Facts Figures 2013-2014
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, SEER Stat Fact Sheets: All Cancer Sites
  • [6] Fernando Jeyandini, 2011, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, V84, P35
  • [7] Fox S., 2011, Pew research internet project: Peer to peer health
  • [8] Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 2013, REL CANC INF INT
  • [9] Marmot MG, 2012, LANCET, V380, P1778, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0, 10.1038/bjc.2013.177]
  • [10] Nelson HD., 2009, SCREENING BREAST CAN