Characteristics of YouTube™ Videos Related to Mammography

被引:27
作者
Basch, Corey H. [1 ]
Hillyer, Grace Clarke [2 ]
MacDonald, Zerlina L. [1 ]
Reeves, Rachel [1 ]
Basch, Charles E. [3 ]
机构
[1] William Paterson Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Wayne, NJ 07470 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Hlth & Behav Studies, Teachers Coll, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Mammography; Screening; YouTube (TM); Social media;
D O I
10.1007/s13187-014-0769-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
With a monthly total of more than one billion unique visitors, YouTube (TM) is one of the Internet's most visited websites and contributes to the growing amount of health-related information on the Internet. The purpose of this study was to analyze coverage of mammography screening in popular YouTube (TM) videos. A total of 173 videos were included in the analysis. Compared with professionally created videos, consumer-created videos had a significantly greater number of comments (> 9 comments 38.0 % for consumer vs. 11.8 % for professional videos, p = < 0.001). Videos created by professionals more often portrayed general mammography information (97.1 vs. 88.7 %) compared to those created by consumers. The vast majority of videos presented general information (93.6 %) related to mammography, and almost two thirds addressed preparing for the test. Less than 20 % dealt with other types of examinations. Approximately 30 % discussed pain associated with the examination (35.3 %) and addressed issues of anxiety (32.4 %) and fear (29.5 %). Nearly half of the videos presented information about the test results (46.2 %). Over 25 % covered medical or family history. The majority did not pertain to a specific age group. Future research should focus on analyzing the accuracy of the information in the videos.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 703
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009, SCREEN BREAST CANC U
[2]   Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet [J].
Ancelle-Park, R. ;
Armaroli, P. ;
Ascunce, N. ;
Bisanti, L. ;
Bellisario, C. ;
Broeders, M. ;
Cogo, C. ;
de Koning, H. ;
Duffy, S. W. ;
Frigerio, A. ;
Giordano, L. ;
Hofvind, S. ;
Jonsson, H. ;
Lynge, E. ;
Massat, N. ;
Miccinesi, G. ;
Moss, S. ;
Naldoni, C. ;
Njor, S. ;
Nystrom, L. ;
Paap, E. ;
Paci, E. ;
Patnick, J. ;
Ponti, A. ;
Puliti, D. ;
Segnan, N. ;
Von Karsa, L. ;
Tornberg, S. ;
Zappa, M. ;
Zorzi, M. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2012, 19 :5-13
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CANC FACTS FIG 2014
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Breast Cancer Facts Figures 2013-2014
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SEER Stat Fact Sheets: All Cancer Sites
[6]  
Fernando Jeyandini, 2011, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, V84, P35
[7]  
Fox S., 2011, Pew research internet project: Peer to peer health
[8]  
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 2013, REL CANC INF INT
[9]  
Marmot MG, 2012, LANCET, V380, P1778, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0, 10.1038/bjc.2013.177]
[10]  
Nelson HD., 2009, SCREENING BREAST CAN