A Computationally More Efficient and More Accurate Stepwise Approach for Correcting for Sampling Error and Measurement Error

被引:25
|
作者
Zitzmann, Steffen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Leibniz Inst Sci & Math Educ, Kiel, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Inst Psychol Learning & Instruct, Kiel, Germany
关键词
Multilevel modeling; structural equation modeling; maximum likelihood; stepwise estimation; stabilization; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; DEFINITE BETWEEN-GROUP; BAYESIAN-APPROACH; COVARIANCE MATRICES; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; MULTILEVEL DATA; MONTE-CARLO; FIT INDEXES; LEVEL; PROBABILITIES;
D O I
10.1080/00273171.2018.1469086
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Over the last decade or two, multilevel structural equation modeling (ML-SEM) has become a prominent modeling approach in the social sciences because it allows researchers to correct for sampling and measurement errors and thus to estimate the effects of Level 2 (L2) constructs without bias. Because the latent variable modeling software Mplus uses maximum likelihood (ML) by default, many researchers in the social sciences have applied ML to obtain estimates of L2 regression coefficients. However, one drawback of ML is that covariance matrices of the predictor variables at L2 tend to be degenerate, and thus, estimates of L2 regression coefficients tend to be rather inaccurate when sample sizes are small. In this article, I show how an approach for stabilizing covariance matrices at L2 can be used to obtain more accurate estimates of L2 regression coefficients. A simulation study is conducted to compare the proposed approach with ML, and I illustrate its application with an example from organizational research.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 632
页数:21
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [11] Looking for validity or testing it? The perils of stepwise regression, extreme-scores analysis, heteroscedasticity, and measurement error
    Antonakis, John
    Dietz, Joerg
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 50 (03) : 409 - 415
  • [12] "Interviewer" Effects in Face-to-Face Surveys: A Function of Sampling, Measurement Error, or Nonresponse?
    West, Brady T.
    Kreuter, Frauke
    Jaenichen, Ursula
    JOURNAL OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS, 2013, 29 (02) : 277 - 297
  • [13] Estimating reliabilities and correcting for sampling error in indices of within-person dynamics derived from intensive longitudinal data
    Schneider, Stefan
    Junghaenel, Doerte U.
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2023, 55 (07) : 3872 - 3891
  • [14] Monitoring of Location Parameters with a Measurement Error under the Bayesian Approach Using Ranked-Based Sampling Designs with Applications in Industrial Engineering
    Khan, Imad
    Noor-ul-Amin, Muhammad
    Khan, Dost Muhammad
    AlQahtani, Salman A.
    Dahshan, Mostafa
    Khalil, Umair
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [15] An efficient approach to automate the manual trial and error calibration of activated sludge models
    Sin, Gurkan
    De Pauw, Dirk J. W.
    Weijers, Stefan
    Vanrolleghem, Peter A.
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2008, 100 (03) : 516 - 528
  • [16] Monte Carlo-Based Error Propagation for a More Reliable Regression Analysis across Specific Rates in Bioprocesses
    Kager, Julian
    Herwig, Christoph
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2021, 8 (11):
  • [17] An approach to safety margin for measurement error and scattered nuclide spectrum on the monitoring for compliance with clearance level
    Hattori, Takatoshi
    Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan, 2004, 3 (04) : 363 - 368
  • [18] Sampling Strategies for Internal Validation Samples for Exposure Measurement-Error Correction: A Study of Visceral Adipose Tissue Measures Replaced by Waist Circumference Measures
    Nab, Linda
    van Smeden, Maarten
    de Mutsert, Renee
    Rosendaal, Frits R.
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 190 (09) : 1935 - 1947