Risk stratification for surgical outcomes in older colorectal cancer patients using ISAR-HP and G8 screening tools

被引:38
|
作者
Souwer, Esteban T. D. [1 ]
Verweij, Norbert M. [2 ]
van den Bos, Frederiek [1 ]
Bastiaannet, Esther [3 ,4 ]
Slangen, Rob M. E. [5 ]
Steup, Willem H. [6 ]
Hamaker, Marije E. [2 ]
Portielje, Johanna E. A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Haga Hosp, Dept Internal Med, POB 40551, NL-2504 LN The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Diakonessen Hosp, Dept Geriatr Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Haga Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, The Hague, Netherlands
[6] Haga Hosp, Dept Surg, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
ISAR-HP; G8; Frailty; Colorectal cancer; Surgery; PREOPERATIVE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION; COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; ADVERSE POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; FUNCTIONAL DECLINE; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; 1ST YEAR; MORTALITY; SURGERY; FRAILTY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgo.2017.09.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Older patients are at risk for adverse outcomes after surgical treatment of cancer. Identifying patients at risk could affect treatment decisions and prevent functional decline. Screening tools are available to select patients for Geriatric Assessment. Until now their predictive value for adverse outcomes in older colorectal cancer patients has not been investigated. Objective: To study the predictive value of the Geriatric 8 (G8) and Identification of Seniors at Risk for Hospitalized Patients (ISAR-HP) screening tools for adverse outcomes after elective colorectal surgery in patients older than 70 years. Primary outcomes were 30-day complication rates, secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and six-month mortality. Study Design and Methods: Multicentre cohort study from two hospitals in the Netherlands. Frail was defined as a G8 and/or ISAR-HP >= 2. Odds ratio (OR) is given with 95% Cl. Results: Overall, 139 patients (52%) out of 268 patients were included; 32 patients (23%) were ISAR-HP-frail, 68 (50%) were G8-frail, 20 were frail on both screening tools. Median age was 77.7 years. ISAR-HP frail patients were at risk for 30-day complications OR 2.4 (CI 1.1-5.4, p = 0.03), readmission OR 3.4 (1.1-11.0), cardiopulmonary complications OR 5.9 (1.6-22.6), longer hospital stay (10.3 versus 8.9 day) and six-months mortality OR 4.9 (1.1-23.4). When ISAR-HP and G8 were combined OR increased for readmission, 30-day and six-months mortality. G8 alone had no predictive value. Conclusions: ISAR-HP-frail patients are at risk for adverse outcomes after colorectal surgery. ISAR-HP combined with G8 has the strongest predictive value for complications and mortality. Key Points: Patients screening frail on ISAR-HP are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Screening results of G8 alone was not predictive for postoperative outcomes. Predictive value increased when G8 and ISAR-HP were combined. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 114
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic value of the G8 and modified-G8 screening tools for multidimensional health problems in older patients with cancer
    Martinez-Tapia, Claudia
    Paillaud, Elena
    Liuu, Evelyne
    Tournigand, Christophe
    Ibrahim, Rima
    Fossey-Diaz, Virginie
    Culine, Stephane
    Canoui-Poitrine, Florence
    Audureau, Etienne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 83 : 211 - 219
  • [2] Validation of the G8 screening tool in older patients with cancer considered for surgical treatment
    Bruijnen, Cheryl P.
    Heijmer, Anne
    Van Harten-Krouwel, Diny G.
    van den Bos, Frederiek
    de Bree, Remco
    Witteveen, Petronella O.
    Emmelot-Vonk, Marielle H.
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (05) : 793 - 798
  • [3] Evaluation of the Groningen Frailty Indicator and the G8 questionnaire as screening tools for frailty in older patients with cancer
    Baitar, Abdelbari
    Van Fraeyenhove, Frank
    Vandebroek, An
    De Droogh, Els
    Galdermans, Daniella
    Mebis, Jeroen
    Schrijvers, Dirk
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 4 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [4] Validity and reliability of the G8 screening test in older non-cancer patients
    Cavusoglu, Cagatay
    Deniz, Olgun
    Tuna Dogrul, Rana
    Ileri, Ibrahim
    Yildirim, Funda
    Caliskan, Hatice
    Ozsurekci, Cemile
    Coteli, Suheyla
    Kizilarslanoglu, Muhammet Cemal
    Goker, Berna
    EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (02) : 397 - 404
  • [5] Diagnostic accuracy of the geriatric screening tools G8 and modified G8 in older patients with lung cancer: A diagnostic performance study
    Bech, Danny
    Lietzen, Lone Winther
    Meldgaard, Peter
    Ryltoft, Anne-Kathrine
    Orum, Marianne
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (02)
  • [6] Detection of frailty in elderly cancer patients: Improvement of the G8 screening test
    Petit-Moneger, Aurelie
    Rainfray, Muriel
    Soubeyran, Pierre
    Bellera, Carine A.
    Mathoulin-Pelissier, Simone
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 7 (02) : 99 - 107
  • [7] G8 and VES-13 as screening tools for geriatric assessment and predictors of survival in older Indian patients with cancer
    Shah, Minit
    Noronha, Vanita
    Ramaswamy, Anant
    Gattani, Shreya
    Mokal, Smruti
    Joshi, Amit
    Patil, Vijay
    Menon, Nandini
    Banavali, Shripad
    Badwe, Rajendra
    Prabhash, Kumar
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (05) : 720 - 730
  • [8] Validation of the G8 screening tool in older patients with aggressive haematological malignancies
    Velghe, Anja
    Petrovic, Mirko
    De Buyser, Stefanie
    Demuynck, Rein
    Noens, Lucien
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2014, 18 (06) : 645 - 648
  • [9] The G8 frailty screening tool and the decision-making process in older breast cancer patients
    Scheepers, Ellen R. M.
    van der Molen, Loes F.
    van den Bos, Frederiek
    Burgmans, Josephine P.
    van Huis-Tanja, Lieke H.
    Hamaker, Marije E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2021, 30 (01)
  • [10] Predictive value of the G8 and the IADL-modified G8 screening tools for postoperative delirium following major urological cancer surgery
    Yajima, Shugo
    Nakanishi, Yasukazu
    Yasujima, Rikuto
    Hirose, Kouhei
    Sekiya, Ken
    Umino, Yousuke
    Ookubo, Naoya
    Kataoka, Madoka
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (08) : 1188 - 1193